Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maxpana3/Archive

20 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * 1) Maxpana3 edited 2 months ago in Polanco and Latin America . He edit-warred in those articles so he edited more than these examples (check contribs list). Then he entered in a "period of inactivity" until he returned hidden behind an anonymous IPs.
 * 2) IP 200.125.16.14 recent edits in Polanco  and Latin America, the same edits Maxpana3 introduced months ago.
 * 3) IP 200.40.216.162 recent edits in Polanco, , again same edits Maxpana3 introduced.


 * Finally Maxpana3 then "returns" from his apparent inactivity only to revert to the IP's version in Latin America.
 * Maxpana3 then files a "vandalism" cause against myself on Dec 17 and IP 200.125.16.14 does the same on Dec 20 . Same complaint, same arguments.
 * Both Maxpana3 and IP 200.125.16.14 accuse me using the same terms and wording. Maxpana3 (Aug 30) and anonymous IP  (Dec 20). Notably the exact same phrase "no caigas en proselitismos".
 * Maxpana3 undid my deletion of a threat by anon. IP 200.125.16.14 on my talk page.

Maxpana3 and the IP's are the same person, trying to avoid scrutinity and prevent sanctions. Using both a registered account and anonymous IPs to edit war is a violation of WP:SOCK. Consistent edit pattern and support of preferred version. Is the only person introducing those changes in articles that are stable.

Thank you.  Alex Covarrubias  ( Talk? )  14:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

That user, ALWAYS revert edits without having a clear rationale and without providing references to endorse statements such as "the most expensive, ""the greatest", "best "..... etc. This user talk page whitening, refuses to resolve conflicts through dialogue, not in compliance with WP:POINT WP:EW and without resolving such conflicts in accordance with what is written here WP: COI. Ask a librarian to defend my views and my issues, as otherwise it would seem that the user is the owner of the articles. Regards --Maxpana3 (talk) 17:48, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Excuse me sir AlexCovarrubias owner of wikipedia, but I want to clarify that I Maxpana3 I have no connection to any IP, has accused me of puppet, so the policy has failed in WP:EQ and WP:PA . Anyway, she asked a manager if the information that I, or the IP changes, this substantiated with references, Mr. AlexCovarrubias entitled to impose their ideas proselytizing to Mexico?. I recommend seeing the same articles in Spanish Wikipedia.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this for now. Edits from the IPs seem to have stopped, and the master is using the account again. I've left the master a warning about logging in to edit, so feel free to relist if it becomes an issue again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)