Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MaxxisSocial/Archive

08 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This one is somewhat ambiguous. The reason is that I reported to WP:AIV as a promotion-only account. The account was blocked, but the template on his talk page used was the one corresponding with the username policy. That template suggests that one create a different account. So, that's what the accused user did, using the name. Note that the letters Mxs are the important letters in the company's name, and 1967 is the when the company was founded.

However, while using both accounts, MaxxisSocial has edit warred with me, and, insisting on creating a spam article out of the redirect Maxxis. That's all either of these accounts have done.

Also, if it's decided that sockpuppetry isn't the issue here (which I'm expecting it will), could someone suggest where to go with this? -&copy;2016 Compassionate727( Talk )( Contributions ) 15:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Apologies, I have been trying to edit this so it reads correctly and is inline with the Wiki policies which I have now reviewed in more detail. When the account was blocked it said to open a new name as it was the name that was the issue. After reading the policies again I understand more the information that can be provided on a page so will ensure the future edits are in line with this. Again, please accept my apologies for my misunderstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxs1967 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ❌ There's not really a reason to have someone bother checking this out when it's not a case of sockpuppetry. -&copy;2016 Compassionate727( Talk )( Contributions ) 17:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Withdrawn by filer. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)