Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MbIam9416/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Evidence is in the History Log of article Battle of Amritsar (1757). User used socking to make edit war with same edits again and again using both user account and IP account. Also the same user used both User account and IP account to make change to article "Second Anglo-Sikh War". Evidence is in the history log. User Mblam9416 also committed edit wars using IP accounts by adding invalid comments not related to article, along with references and sources that didn't support the edits. Below is also the evidence of same changes by both accounts from the history log of article "Battle of Amritsar (1757)".

00:49, 26 April 2021‎ 119.160.65.93 talk‎+616

Nawab of Amb

that was supported by the Nawab of Amb, Suba Khan Tanoli against the

00:45, 26 April 2021‎ MbIam9416 talk contribs‎+616

Nawab of Amb

that was supported by the Nawab of Amb, Suba Khan Tanoli against the

Also from same article history log of Battle of Amritsar (1757):

119.160.68.21 Nawab of Amb

Here user actually commented his own account name. 10:10, 25 April 2021‎ 119.160.65.93 talk‎+616‎ Talk MbIam9416.

Here is another evidence from history log of Second Anglo Sikh war. Here is the comparison of same edits by both user account and the sock puppet.

00:51, 26 April 2021‎ 119.160.65.93 talk+758

was supported by the Nawab of Amb. The Jehandad Khan with his uncle Maddad Khan Tanoli in order to revenge the death of Mir Painda Khan was caused by giving poisoned by General Dhaurikal Singh, commanding officer of the Sikh troops in Hazara, in September 1844 or in order to recover his Territory .Then the battle

00:45, 26 April 2021‎ MbIam9416 talk contribs‎+758

was supported by the Nawab of Amb. The Jehandad Khan with his uncle Maddad Khan Tanoli in order to revenge the death of Mir Painda Khan was caused by giving poisoned by General Dhaurikal Singh, commanding officer of the Sikh troops in Hazara, in September 1844 or in order to recover his Territory .Then the battle

Also if you look at the history log at the article of Kalabagh, Mblam9416 made an edit using sock 119.160.68.21 but when his changes were reverted due to vandalism, he re-added the same change with Mblam9416 account.

19:45, 28 April 2021‎ MbIam9416 talk contribs‎+443‎

18:04, 22 April 2021‎ Yoohooyoo talk contribs‎−442‎ Undid revision 1018767999 by 119.160.68.21 (talk) an act of vandalism

19:16, 19 April 2021‎ 119.160.68.21 talk‎+442

More similar evidence, if you look at the history log of Indian campaign of Ahmad Shah Durrani, Mblam9416 made change using 119.160.68.21 sockpuppet but when his change was reverted, he re-added changes using account Mblam9416.

08:52, 19 April 2021‎ MbIam9416 talk contribs‎+61‎

08:44, 19 April 2021‎ HistoryofIran talk contribs‎−61‎ Undid revision 1018675729 by 119.160.68.21 (talk)

08:25, 19 April 2021‎ 119.160.68.21 talk‎+61

User has used sock puppets on various articles.

HaughtonBrit (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)HaughtonBrit HaughtonBrit (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I left a uw-login warning on MbIam9416's talk page, which seems like enough for now. Based on the warnings on their talk page, looks like they're not taking WP:5P to heart, so if they come back to SPI again, I think the AGF account is pretty much exhausted. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)