Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mcepeci/Archive

29 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

On, the sock restored the same edit for which the master was blocked for warring in. WP:DUCK. VQuakr (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. The timing of the new account is suspicious. Stylistically, the two accounts are quite different. There is a possibility they are different people both attracted here because of the Pollard campaign. There is also a possibility this is meat puppetry and the old account recruited the new because they were blocked. If I block based on a CU or meat puppetry, the master account has escalating blocks for edit-warring, meaning that an SPI block would have to be at least long-term if not indefinite. Thus, I'd like to proceed a little more cautiously.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * After last check this was real easy! User:Hasan shemiyo and both named accounts are all ✅ to each other. NativeForeigner Talk 22:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The additional sock tipped the scales in favor of an indefinite block for the master. All three accounts indeffed and tagged. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)