Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mcjakeqcool/Archive

Report date November 21 2009, 13:24 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

plus the user name of course. Favonian (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Favonian (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

I am not guilty of sockpuppetry. I do not even know who User Mcjakeqcool is. I am User Mcjakeqcool2 not User Mcjakeqcool and I plead not guilty. mcjakeqcool2 Mcjakeqcool2 (talk) 13:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC) I do apologize, talk page edits should not be marked as minor. mcjakeqcool2 Mcjakeqcool2 (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Appears obvious based on the editing of User:Mcjakeqcool and associated talkpage, and the restoration of original material removed from the User talk:Mcjakeqcool page. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 13:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * I love how his username is the same except for a two and continues to think we are mentally challanged by failing to attempt at a somewhat non-obvious user name.  Pick both man lol  13:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This page/investigation probably shouldn't have even been created - it's just giving him attention. Tan   &#124;   39  16:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That's why I just dumped it into ANI for a block.Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I suggest a checkuser still be run. 86.21.66.162 was blocked since it was obvious Mcjakeqcool was using it to evade his sanction, and only a week or two ago another IP was blocked for the same reason.  Might be good to use a checkuser to sniff out any other IPs or accounts Mcjakeqcool might be using. HonouraryMix (talk) 17:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Edits seem to be very similar to the accused main, I think I will be agreeing with HonouraryMix on this suggestion. ☭  Pick both man lol  ☭ 18:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

I don't think it's necessary to endorse checkuser at the moment – as Tan said, this probably shouldn't have been created. If he returns, then we can have checkusers look into it. Best, Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Report date January 13 2010, 17:51 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

I'm not sure exactly what the user is trying to do but it looks as though he's created a sock to start a ridiculous talk page thread and then create a frivilous AN/I report.  raseaC talk to me 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  raseaC talk to me


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by  raseaC talk to me 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

– It's either clear WP:DUCK, or neither are here to participate in editing an encyclopedia. In either case, both are blockable, and I don't think it's worth a check. –MuZemike 03:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * For what it's worth, this is User:Mcjakeqcool. --jpgordon:==( o ) 16:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep. After looking at the edit summaries, it's him. Moving case. –MuZemike 20:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Both accounts indefinitely blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 03:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by SluggoOne
Anyone familiar with Mcjakeqcool's editing patterns will notice several similarities. If you want to know, ask me via email since it seems Mcjake has stopped committing one really obvious tell. Notice, also, 1971's familiarity with WP's terms and behind-the-scenes locales after fewer than two dozen edits.
 * Missed this one. Request immediate indefblock of obvious sock of banned user Mcjakeqcool. Şłџğģő  05:19, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
The edit above, his other edits, and the fact that he was banned again from another videogame website for either trolling or socking pretty much nails it on the head. Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 16:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by SluggoOne
User has committed several tells. As usual, please email me rather than make any guesses here, since we don't want to show our cards. Şłџğģő 20:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I just got an email from a person whose address is very close to Twyfords's username:


 * Request immediate block per WP:DUCK. Şłџğģő 21:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
 * I do not know of this User but I am not him judgeing by his contributions there is no case to suggest such a thing. Twyfords-Tri-Shell (talk) 20:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I am a new user and am not a pro at wikipeida but this is my defence... There are many Jacob Quinns in the UK. I don't no much about the policy around wikipeida but that is just a assumption. And I'm not gonna lie this is my eMail adress...

twyfords-tri-shell@hotmail.co.uk and although I am twyfords-tri-shell I am not Mcjakeqcool. My defence is clear, Jacob Quinn but not the 'famous' sockpuppeter. Twyfords-Tri-Shell (talk) 21:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twyfords-Tri-Shell (talk • contribs)
 * JamesBWatson that is your opinion I disagree. Twyfords-Tri-Shell (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's getting late real life is calling me, I am NOT Mcjakeqcool there is no evidence if there is eMail me you know where. Chanelle wants it I gotta give it to her. Goodnite. Twyfords-Tri-Shell (talk) 21:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
I have had a look at various edits by Mcjakeqcooland his sockpuppets Mcjakeqcool2 and Dg-reg-fd-1971. I have compared them with edits by Twyfords-Tri-Shell. Apart from any other considerations all of them show exactly the same kinds of errors in English to such an extent as to make this a DUCK. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kenneth Walters
Some users via email have been asking me if I am Mcjakeqcool, which i'm not and i'm requesting a chekuser to tell the truth. Kenneth Walters Kenneth Walters (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Elen of the Roads Right down to typing This article is a stub can you help wikiedia by expanding it? at the bottom of the page. There is no way this is not McJakeqcool. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Added Kenneth's bot to the list.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Just restored this after deletion by Kenneth. If he's not Jake, I'll eat my hat. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:05, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not Jake. Has this been listed under Awaiting Clerk Approval? CrimsonBlazer 16:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes it has --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hes innocent i am Mcjakeqcool he isnt and my name is Jacob Quinn. Mcjameskcool Mcjameskcool (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Added Joe Shelton and Ebenezer Daniels as they were talking to each other about money and death threats...something Mcjakeqcool has done before with Stephen-Lord-Wiki and Nicholas-Ball-Wiki. See Joe's page for the convosation and Ebenezers for the ANI link. Jacob Martin Quinn (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

In the 84 years I have been alive, I have never seen such appauling behavior. All these suspects should be ashamed of themselves. Even my own grandchildren are better behaved. Prudence Ash (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * So much for this promise to behave for six months. --bonadea contributions talk 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Kenneth Walters Kenneth Walters (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

– more socks are popping up as I write. Need a check for underlying IP and sleepers. –MuZemike 16:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Both accounts are now indefinitely blocked. –MuZemike 16:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

It's possible he may use the CrimsonBlazer username at some point in the future based on his request at WP:CHU. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 17:22, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Also based on his sig above where he uses that name. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 17:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL, . –MuZemike 17:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Checkuser note: Range softblocked short-term. Risker (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I think that's all that can be done at this point. Closing the case. –MuZemike 19:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

(post-SPI admin note) The above socks were not from Mcjakeqcool but were from banned user. –MuZemike 16:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)