Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mealwaysrockz007/Archive

16 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All three accounts and the IP have removed the same content from the Kamal Haasan article the IP just once on January 7 and the three accounts since their creation on January 10, January 15, and January 16 respectively (Title hero:  ; Ajith009:   ; Rajani003: Special:Contributions/Rajani003). I'm most suspicious that Ajith009 and Rajani003 are related due to the similar username pattern and use (or lack thereof) of edit summaries but also think that Title hero and 111.92.21.134 could be the same user...I have listed Title hero as the master sheerly because it is the oldest registered account of the three. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 21:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Note An essentially duplicate SPI is at Sockpuppet investigations/Sweetrascal123. I named because it seemed to be the first of such edits, and the account was already blocked, plus this edit (in fact the very first for that account), which is essentially the exact same removal of information. I think it would be worthwhile to check if he's part of the same set. User:Ks0stm did note in my talk page the existence of this diff, where Sweetrascal123 actually reverts Title hero, so there's that to consider. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 22:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have blocked for edit warring/3RR violation on the Kamal Haasan article.  Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 22:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Cases have been merged. Rschen7754 22:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

✅ =



Some of these are already marked as socks of Mealwaysrockz007. An IP block would be impractical. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  02:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocking master 1 month which is a reset of his one week block that he evaded plus 3 weeks for egregious socking. Tagged socks and closing.

31 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Opening per checkuser request. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * related to, a previously blocked sock, ✅:

-- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  00:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, extending master to indef. Closing. Rschen7754 04:03, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

08 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (added 3/19)
 * (added 3/19)
 * (added 3/19)
 * (added 3/19)
 * (added 3/19)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I am opening this case on behalf of a new user. I will let that user provide more detailed evidence, but a quick glance at the edit summaries and target articles appears to show a significant relation.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC) --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I suspect User:Nightocean to be the sock puppet of User:Flowers of the world after going through their edit histories.

a) Both of them are fans of actors Kunchacko Boban, Mammootty and Dulquer Salmaan. They repeatedly try to push their POV onto the articles of these actors and their films through their edits/reverts.

b) Both of them are active on similar film based articles and they seem to work in tandem. Other than the above specified articles, they are very diligent in removing NPOV/BLP violations on other actors and films. Their editing pattern, the articles they choose and the timing are very much alike.

c) Their language skills seems to be pretty bad. They don't actually add anything of their own to the pages. All they do is copy and paste, deletions and reverts. Even their edit summaries are copied and pasted from other users especially User:TheRedPenOfDoom.

I've received messages from both these accounts in my talk page. Please check the similarities in their comments (note how they spell 'consider' for instance),

Nightoocean says "Mr. Kunjacko Boban has acted in 50 films in malayalam cinema as lead and supporting actor and is cosidered as one of the leading actors of malayalam cinema. his latest realse romans has been widely acclaimed for his performance. thank u." check diff

Flowersoftheworld says "Mr. Mammootty has acted in more than 360 films,in malayalam cinema as lead actor and is cosidered as one of the leading method actors of malayalam cinema. this is long standing sourced material you can check it. thanks" check diff

Also check the comment by Flowersoftheworld in the talkpage of user User_talk:TheRedPenOfDoom,

"Mr. kunchacko boban has acted in more than 50 films,in malayalam cinema as lead actor and is cosidered as one of the leading actors of malayalam cinema. this is long standing sourced material you can check it. thanks." check diff

Please also note that the article selection and edit pattern of these accounts have apparent similarities to that of blocked User:Materialthunder. Material thunder is also a fan of the above mentioned actors. He was banned for repeatedly pushing POV and giving factually incorrect boxoffice figures in the pages related to these actors.

JK (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * There is something fishy going on among the accounts, although it is hard to say what. At the Kunchacko_Boban article, you have Nightocean reverting Materialthunder and a string of Flowers of the world and Intellectual savior reverting each other --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Examples of Nightooccean and flowersoftheworld trying to push their POV to glorify the actors they adore,

Nightoocean:

diff1 - This even though Kunchacko Boban is the supporting actor in that film

diff2 - Tries to give more prominence to Mammootty and his film Pazhassi Raja.

diff3 - Giving wrong box office figures in Pazhassi Raja (2009 film), a Mammootty film.

diff4

diff5

diff6

diff7

- removing tables from pages of other actors

diff8 - adding tables in Dulquer Salmaan

Flowers of the world:

diff1 - Adding tables in Kunchacko Boban

diff 2 - Adding tables in Dulquer Salmaan (please also note that Dulquer Salmaan is the son of Mammootty)

diff3

diff4 - removing tables from the pages of other actors

diff5 Glorifying Mammootty

diff6 Depreciating Mohanlal

The poor language skill and disruptive attitude of these accounts are visible from the fact that flowers of the world blanked this entire page rather than defending their position here.

user:Materialthunder was blocked on February 27th. Flowersoftheworld started active editing from February 27th. Flowersoftheworld created his user page on Feb 27th while Nighttoocean created his userpage on Feb 26th. Lets see some diffs involving Materialthunder,

diff1 - Pushing pro-Kunchacko Boban POV in a film with an ensemble cast.

diff2 - Giving wrong box office figures in Pazhassi Raja (2009 film), a Mammootty film.

diff3 Glorifying Kunchacko Boban

diff4 Glorifying Mammootty

diff5 Glorifying Mammootty

diff6 Depreciating Mohanlal

diff7 Glorifying Dulquer Salmaan

So the commonalities of these accounts are,

1) Adulation for Kunchacko Boban, Mammootty and Dulquer Salman.

2) Depreciating other actors and their films.

3) Lifting (copy-paste) the edit summaries by other users and using them indiscreetly all over the place

JK (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Flowers of the world and Intellectual savior are same person I think


 * 1) diff1 and diff2 - Vishal and Ram Charan Teja articles. same edit summary. both edits made in 2 minutes (8 March 2013 15:13, 8 March 2013 15:15).


 * 2) diff1 and diff2 - Aashiq Abu and Ram Charan Teja articles. same edit summary. both edits made in 2 minutes (9 March 2013 11:33, 9 March 2013 11:35).

Both of these editors, as well as TRPoD himself, seem to be needlessly removing filmography tables from some actor's articles. Sometimes they appear to co-operate (to avoid the three revert rule perhaps) as in here, and sometimes they appear to be on differing sides as in here. Very strange. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  14:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I concur that there is definite socking going on here, but TRPoD's actions are equally suspicious as they tie in with the edits by the proposed socks. I would recommend a CU on all the socks as well as TRPoD altogether. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 06:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * a review of the edits will show that i am removing the needless tables from articles as per Manual of Style/Tables, while the accounts named in the investigation are removing the tables from some articles while reinserting the needless tables in others. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  06:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * the IP 111.92.20.148's first edit is to a newly created article by Intellectual savior and then the edits go on to promotional content an article that user nightocean has also frequented to add promotional content. The IPs edit  on the new  filmography article to remove a request for sources  was immediately redone by IS. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Material thunder has also joined the edit war JK (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - It's a clear case of socking, but I'm requesting checkuser to find out who is whose sock, as it's conceivable if doubtful that there is one innocent editor here. In addition to the above ample evidence, what is most concerning to me is that  and  were created mere minutes apart, and the level of editor interaction is simply mindblowing for such new users: . Someguy1221 (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * All the given accounts are ✅ with each other, and from my perspective, appear to be operated by the same individual. No comment on the IP address. WilliamH (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * This was abusive socking from day 1, so master and socks all indeffed. Someguy1221 (talk) 20:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

28 March 2013

 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)
 * (added 4/2)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Match summary and Mollywood1 are quite easily identified as duck socks of each other. and
 * and the duck tie to the Flowers sock drawer

Another user has indicated that Mollywood1 is connected to the Flowers of the world sock drawer; and initial view of the edits supports the link, but I will let that user supply more details. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:28, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * the users have been indeffed, so this can probably be closed, unless a CU for sleepers seems appropriate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC) New accounts have been added. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I think User:Merenjith, User:London_at_night and User:111.92.2.111  are sock puppets of Flowers of the world.

Kunchacko Boban is the article flowersoftheworld frequented the most.


 * Mollywood1 pushing promotional commentary diff


 * 111.92.2.111 adding the same content diff


 * Merenjith adding the same content diff


 * London at night warning me for removing the above content diff


 * Understanding between Merenjith and London at night diff
 * Merenjith removing the refimprove tags diff JK (talk) 04:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * adding pen.cil.80 per the target articles and  and . --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Adding User:Muthulingam swami per  and. JK (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Merged case on Suriya180. T. Canens (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC) This is a recently created account which undid TheRedPenOfDoom's revert of on. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Worth checking Merenjith and London, plus sleepers. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

T. Canens (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * All blocked and tagged. Left the IP unblocked as it hasn't edited in almost two weeks. Jafeluv (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

16 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

diff indicates it's the same person as User:Flowers of the world, as he is a diehard fan of Kunchako Boban.  Dravidian   Hero  10:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser unnecessary, DeltaQuad has already blocked Black milk 9 for sockpuppetry. Closing. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm actually running a sleeper check right now, but it's going to be a bit before I have results. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  11:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not able to finish this check actually, as I'm past my monthly bandwidth at home, and i'm trying to conserve what I have to pay. I don't use CU at school, so I need another CU to pick this up. On one of the ranges I checked this morning (I can't remember if it's just one or more than one) there is another sockmaster, but it is the same user as this sockmaster I determined. I don't remember the name, but there will be several blocked socks to go off of. I will owe the CU that picks this up a beer or box of cookies, your choice and if we meet up, I promise you you'll get it. -- DQ on the road   (ʞlɐʇ)  21:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅ a Flowers of the World sock, for the record. Most likely DQ is looking for Sockpuppet investigations/Mealwaysrockz007. I'll take cookies! :) - Mailer Diablo 03:01, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Should the cases be merged? --Rschen7754 05:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's who it is, and they should be merged. I assume MD found no sleepers though? Which seems a little odd, but then again I didn't look far enough to know for sure. -- DQ on the road   (ʞlɐʇ)  21:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ and  are new socks of this master. --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  18:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing then. Rschen7754 07:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

29 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The editor is focused on one of the primary obsessions of the puppet master, Kamal Hasan. Ajith real7 has the same 'tell' of indiscriminately cutting and pasting edit summaries from other users. The Aijith prefix has been used in at least 2 other socks: Ajith009 and Ajith008. and from the blocked sock and  from Aijith real7] pretty much seals the deal. the ID is pretty much DUCK, but a check user may be a good thing to get any extra socks. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  09:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC) --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  09:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Check for sleeper socks. King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, found one sleeper, . . WilliamH (talk) 08:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All blocked, closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

14 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

the editor pops in with the standard Kunchacko_Boban promotional material that the various socks have added and the same obsession with placing their favorite actors first in cast lists   as the other socks   --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * and the edit summaries -  are the clincher. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

the previous attempts have frequently included sleepers so a check user might be a good idea. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Named account is ✅, but I didn't see any sleepers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged, closing. Jafeluv (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

27 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets



Per the edit patterns, misuse of warning templates, same edit summary used by the blocked sockpuppets and misuse of WP:AIV JK (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Also note the user pushing Kunchacko Boban promotional content here and here

JK (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This actually came up through a different venue, but the account is very the master. --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  15:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Behavior and timing is consistent with Master, blocked, tagged, closing. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ / Join WER 23:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

31 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The usual Kunchako Boban push edit: diff within the first post  Dravidian   Hero   13:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obvious sock blocked and tagged. Page protected, no need for CU on this one. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Easily obvious from the edit pattern and level of interaction of these accounts with the blocked socks. Both the accounts uses the same copy-pasted edit summaries of the previously blocked socks. This inappropriate warning  (pasting the exact same words I used while warning a blocked sock of the same master) seals it. Not sure if a checkuser is needed, I request a quick block of these duck socks. JK (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Please consider this diff. The edit summary is lifted from. Cut pasting edit summaries is one of the specialties of this user. Hard to believe that a new user is so aware of the MOS discussions. JK (talk) 04:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Best in the world 56 blocked as an obvious sock per evidence provided. For King of king sajay, it is not immediately obvious to me why they are a sock, so please provide a diff from them along with a diff from the master or known sock. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * - - The evidence is good, clearly matches behavior in the archive. Please do a sleeper check as well, due to this user's history of having lots of sleepers. Also, is this user the same as Mailersonly? Both have a history of targeting TRPoD and JK. King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Both accounts are ✅ socks. WilliamH (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closed. Rschen7754 07:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
added later
 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Per the edit pattern and level of interaction of these accounts with the blocked socks. Kunchacko Boban and Mammootty are two pages frequented by the blocked accounts.  . The accounts edit summaries are also cut-pasted. Requesting a quick block of the duck sock. JK (talk) 03:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Adding new account User:Indian film 100yrs of mkht based on JK (talk) 08:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I edit Kunchacko Boban and Mammootty because of your baseless claims, bad editing on wikiOnam2013 (talk)  05:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't know who is this onam2013. today i created a account till yesterday i am editing with my IP. The administrators warn me so that i creat a account. you can check my IP and his IP if both are same administrators can block me Indian film 100yrs of mkht (talk)
 * absolute WP:DUCKs from the absurd phrasing of "evergreen blockbuster" to the cut and paste copying of another user's userpage . support a checkuser as the sockmaster is likely to have created sleepers.--  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  08:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Nice joke Indian film 100yrs of mkht (talk) 08:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)


 * no, the promotion is so blatant and the socking and is so lame it is not funny at all.--  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  09:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't know who is this onam2013. and i am not sock o anybody Indian film 100yrs of mkht (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * the rabid promotion of Kunchacko_Boban

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  09:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * as as rationalized by blocked sock Merenjith
 * as rationalized by the current quacker
 * as rationalized by the blocked sock Smackdownnight8

I have added an IP based on this: Onam2013 leaves an NPA violation at 10:00, 29 September 2013. He logs out and 2 minutes later adjusts the "warning" as the IP -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  11:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Can you please provide more diffs or additional context, for those of us not familiar with this user? Rschen7754 09:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * - on Indian film 100yrs of mkht, for a sleeper check. Still waiting for Onam2013 diffs, though of course it may come up on the CU check. Rschen7754 06:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Technical CU data on Indian film 100yrs of mkht are . Better behavioral data are needed. Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blocked Indian film under DUCK. I'll leave this up for a day or two in case evidence is provided against the other account. Rschen7754 07:03, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * My check was equal in utility to Materialscientist's. L Faraone  01:29, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked the other account after looking at contributions made after the check. Closing. Rschen7754 17:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

09 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Life is a game22 pops into existence the day after the most recent sock is blocked. His first edits are to redirect content to an article he has created Kunchacko Boban (actor). I dont have access to that deleted article, but I am willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that it is this version (to which LIG22 has also reverted the main article) which is the same version that our sock drawer keeps inserting.

The IP is repeating the Nobody is perfect and i am nobody bloat on the filmography as well as the standard put the names of the actors that I like first and remove the names of actors i dont like as the Nightocean sock did

Requesting checkuser for sleepers.

Also requesting complete lockdown of the article to prevent yet another repeat of such shenanigans. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * after some magic history merge maneuvering by RHaworth, i guess I owe someone some dollars. the created version by LIG22 is exactly the same version as blocked sock Onam2013 PLUS the entire bloated Filmography article as pushed by blocked sock Nobody is perfect and i am nobody. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  22:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CU-wise, it is that Life is a game22 is Indian film 100yrs of mkht and Onam2013 (Life is a game22 provided a link between those two, which was missing). It is also likely that is part of this group. Blocks and search for sleepers should be accompanied by behavioral evidence, as the underlying IP ranges are too big and busy. I've semiprotected Kunchacko Boban. Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've also indeffed based on behavior in addition to CU verification above. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  21:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

24 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

this explanation] of this edit summary. Neither has anything to do with table format, but Mealwaysrockz007 will edit war to keep tables in articles and remove the "unsourced" tag from the unsourced article. As Flowers of the world sock removal of "unsourced" tag from sourced articles as Materialthunder sock. The Nobody is perfect and I am nobody sock
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * again, this time with the same nonsequitor comments about removing tables in an edit that has nothing to do with removing/adding tables

This sock incarnation has included a lot of random article roulette to attempt to throw off the investigations at the beginning, but they  have not been able to keep up the deception and the only articles upon which they return are the Kunchacko Boban filmography, the article created   by the Intellectual savior sock. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC) --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  17:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Seems like it's worth a check: same articles and same issue with tables. Rschen7754 01:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Clock 12:13 is very part of the group Life is a game22, Onam2013, Nobody is perfect and i am nobody & Co. Materialscientist (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Moved to indef and closing. Rschen7754 03:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

28 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The first edits are to create a user page and talk page,  so they do not appear obviously newly created accounts. - they create them by copying content from some experienced user as it is obvious that a new user is not "no longer tracking" their contributions. (see flowers of the world  and  intellectual savior and nightocean  The first article space edit is to remove the actor they do not like from preceding their fan obsession Kunchacko Boban in the movie cast list  see titlepunk3  --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC) --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indianmadepunk is ✅ and blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

06 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Persistently promoting Mammootty like the blocked sockpuppets.      JK (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blind CU scan gives a dozen or more of possible "socks", including Anjaan333, of Mealwaysrockz007 and some others. Many of them edit film-related articles, while some go to other topics. In other words, there is too much interference in this IP range, behavioral evidence is crucial. Materialscientist (talk) 02:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * blocked indef. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)