Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meepsheep/Archive

12 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Cross-wiki vandalism (along with non-Wikimedia wikis), personal attacks, template vandalism, etc. The socks mentioned above are not the only ones; they were however the few I could locate. Yummi7 (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Filer blocked. TN X Man 17:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

24 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This is a second request; for some reason, my original isn't showing in the edit history. In any event, a rangeblock is long overdue. I suggested a course of action regarding a possible filter at the ANI and this little sweetheart apparently got wind of it. Either way, yes, I am requesting a good, long rangeblock. PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
PMDrive1061, CU is not going to help here, and you should know that. There was a reason why I deleted this, which you are not understanding why. –MuZemike 21:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The account in question has already been globally suppressed. (Not like that it matters now, as ''it already has been mentioned above!) –MuZemike 21:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

07 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

The name is pretty self-evident and if possible, a rangeblock is more than warranted. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
– We cannot do any rangeblocks! I thought I explained this last time. –MuZemike 02:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * - Nothing we can do. Sorry, PMDrive1061. Bsadowski1 02:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

03 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Usernames match to previously suspected sockpuppets. Thebirdlover (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Also on the most recent account she redirects many pages to truth that basically admit to be her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebirdlover (talk • contribs) 05:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Personally, I was on ED talking to that user when the vandalisim happened. Meepsheep admitted to the two blocked and the others I assumed to be the same user.

--Thebirdlover (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * In that case can you link to where it was admitted that these were him? Mwalimu1 (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The two currently blocked seem to be Meepsheep, but the other two we don't have anything to go on, and I don't see where they admit it. One account does not exist. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * - This is fishing. No evidence that the other accounts belong to him. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:18, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

17 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Due to its offensive nature and the outing of an editor, I've not only deleted the evidence but requested oversight for it as well. For those users with appropriate permissions, please see this and this; note the Twitter handle and signature. Requesting checkuser since it's been a while since Meepsheep's last appearance and I want to make sure that there are no sleepers hanging around. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

I have added Csutric and Csusarah as they both added multiple library resources box templates ( and ) to articles. These templates translude the library link about template, which involved the now oversighted edit found here:. Mike V •  Talk  16:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Self-endorsing for checkuser. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * is now . The other CSU* accounts are ❌. (Note the timing of the edits&mdash;they added the templates long before Meepsheep vandalized it.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Snowolf has locked the Always noided account, and I've unblocked the two Csu* accounts. Legoktm (talk) 17:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)