Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mehrrunissa/Archive

Evidence submitted by Vinter-light
User Mehrrunissa and Keysvolume are suspected to be the same person. They edited at the exact same time, in the exact same way. Please note user Mehrrunissa has been doing large amounts of deletion and reverts, repeatedly for last 3 days. Keysvolume followed the pattern. They did it this time after article was semi-protected.

(cur) (prev) 05:20, 14 October 2009 Keysvolume (talk | contribs) (21,788 bytes) (Undid revision 319761208 by Keysvolume (talk)) (cur) (prev) 05:18, 14 October 2009 Keysvolume (talk | contribs) (23,568 bytes) (rv sock puppet of User:Barakabless) (cur) (prev) 04:16, 14 October 2009 Mehrrunissa (talk | contribs) (21,788 bytes) (cur) (prev) 20:03, 13 October 2009 Tedder (talk | contribs) m (24,892 bytes) (template grammar fix) (cur) (prev) 20:02, 13 October 2009 Tedder (talk | contribs) (24,889 bytes) (cur) (prev) 20:02, 13 October 2009 Tedder (talk | contribs) m (24,804 bytes) (Protected Salwa Judum: Edit warring / Content dispute: EW among new users and IPs. Take to talk page. ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Vinter-light (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

– Next time, please put in a code letter so that we know why CU is needed. MuZemike 21:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
. Different ranges, different user agents, no overlap. J.delanoy gabs adds 23:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Closing. NW ( Talk ) 23:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Oftenhurry
User Mehrrunissa was blocked some days back due to use of sockpuppets and disruptive edits. Wentwalk is a new user, whose editing pattern is exactly the same as Mehrrunissa. Both of these editors, edit politically sensitive articles, trying to push their POV, by inserting slandarous statements or adjectives randomly, although they do not appear in the original statement and the references remain same. The anon users just revert to edits of this particular kind. Please check the recent edit by Wentwalk here - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahendra_Karma&action=historysubmit&diff=320392637&oldid=319878784 Oftenhurry (talk) 17:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I only see one edit by Wentwalk, which isn't really indicative of it being a sock of Mehrrunissa. The IP edits are more troublesome, but they do not establish any link to Wentwalk from what I can tell, though could be to Mehrrunissa per WP:DUCK. Unless you have something more concrete, I think this request against Wentwalk will be declined. Nja 247 08:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
No action taken. Behavioral evidence doesn't indicate that Wentwalk is a sock of anyone. The IPs are clearly socks of Mehrrunissa, but I'm not going to block the IPs at this time as that will likely prove useless as they have not edited in over 3 days. Mehrrunissa is already indefinitely blocked. MuZemike 16:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)