Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mehulamin22/Archive

28 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious sock puppet and puppeteer with editing the article Mehul amin. Wgolf (talk) 19:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, provide us some diffs to show how this is an "obvious sock puppet".  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:35, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Dang-it was a few days ago and I don't quite remember and can't find any info now....Wgolf (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * -Okay now I get it, both have made Mehul amin, which notice is one of the users names? Wgolf (talk) 22:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * - Well, in that case, I'd call it a duck. CU not needed. Mehulamin22 identified himself as Mehul Amin on his user page . I can't see his deleted edits, but it seams that he created autobiographical article few days ago. He was told here not to create autobiographies. Soon after that, new user Shiva229 appears and creates an article about Mehul Amin two times ( and ).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * . Admin needed to block.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing this as a duck. In fact, it's not obvious that the two accounts are the same person, much less that there has been abuse. The only overlap is one edit on a deleted page. It's possible (likely, even) that these are two individuals who probably know each other in real life. I don't think there's anything sinister going on here (though they may end up blocked for self-promotion if they carry on). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  20:52, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I have no objection. Both accounts stopped editing. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)