Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mf. von Karma/Archive

09 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Mf. von Karma added here an unsourced ranking of countries that won the Miss Universe. I came across it on 26 March 2016 and removed it as fancruft and WP:OR. On 9 april the IP 14.187.141.185 restored the list in its one and only edit. I reverted that a counple of hours later. A few hours later the brand new editor Aleena Ahmed restored the info. Both here and here (and I reverted both times). After explaining the situation on User talk:Aleena Ahmed, I hoped it would stop before we had a full blown edit war. Unfortunately, within half an hour the list was again re-added. This time by JuanDo169, who only registered this morning and only made one edit thus far.

I think I stumbled again on a sockfarm instead of multiple user. The Banner talk 17:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no direct evidence that it is a sockfarm, sorry about that. That part is based on my frustration of many other sockpuppets, sockfarms and meatpuppets active on pageants. The Banner talk 09:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Im not of any sockpuppets of any One. Im main truly concentrating on South-Indian articles. Check out of the majors of my contributions. --Aleena Ahmed (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Any specific reason to suspect that you've come across a "sockfarm" instead of a standard socking case? Regarding all the listed socks,, so the CU request will probably be declined, as the behavioral evidence is strong enough not to need technical confirmation, unless there's a seperate reason CU might be helpful. (CU data becomes for the listed master in 6 days, so if there's a reason, it might be good to have it quickly.) Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 03:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Admin action needed - based on clear WP:REPEATING: see filer's statement, which is very concise.  with regards to CheckUser; it is not needed here as the socks are DUCKs without need for technical evidence, and no good cause for a sleeper check has been shown. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Socks indeffed and master blocked for 10 days. IP not active anymore. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)