Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mfetzer3/Archive

Report date July 10 2009, 21:12 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Cobaltbluetony

Deleted article "Meetinguniverse" (also check "Meetinguniverse.com") history needs to be reviewed. Identical or nearly identical content was first submitted by, then by. Neither user had made substantial edits to any other article; nor since. User:Mfetzer3 claims User:Hospitalityexpert is an associate (making him a meatpuppet). This request is to verify this so that the appropriate use of the template can be determined, insomuch as the suspected sockpuppeteer wants to prove he is not violating this policy. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Generally if we can determine two accounts are doing something blockable, we don't approve a CU. Since they have already admitted to meatpuppetry, I'm not sure a CU is justified.  Thoughts?  MBisanz  talk 02:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Someone should point them both to WP:SOCK and the meatpuppet section and encourage them to work to adding properly sourced acceptable content. -- Avi (talk) 05:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Done. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)