Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mgunetiquette/Archive

18 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Mgunetiquette has been previously blocked for disruptive editing. I received a direct complain from one of the subjects of an article expressing concern about the changes being made to their article. I am concerned, not only for BLP violation issues, but, the past that this person has with disruptive editing about the same subjects - Jim Goad and Gavin McInnes. The user also seems to not assume good faith and gets a bit attack-like in their edit summaries. They are also blantantly non-neutral in their contributions (or removal of content). You can simply see it in the article history.. Sarah (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Obvious sock is obvious. I've gone ahead and blocked indef due to socking, posting to disparage BLP subjects, and posting non-public, personal information (phone numbers). This editor has already been indef blocked and that block has not been addressed - A l is o n  ❤ 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC)