Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mhagay/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

SPAs at Articles for deletion/Zari Kovo, following a disruptive nomination by Tapal2024 who is already blocked for socking. TLA tlak 03:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Same applies, hence later added by: gidonb (talk) 13:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC) adding these, per the above TLA  tlak 23:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
 * I share the reporter's concern and have raised similar concerns here and here. Copying my main lines so one will not have to chase after snippets: "concern is that these are sockpuppets of the nominator who has meanwhile been blocked. One of the two supporting identities is already accumulating warnings." "This is a disruptive nomination, with a nonsensical intro, from an account that has since been blocked." "For Juice00001 and Success302, with very few edits, this is the first AfD." gidonb (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * It could be relevant that the biography includes a rape conviction and that the millionaire appears to have paid to remove that at Hewiki. To no avail. Of course, we should not include said crime because of spite and only per our policies and guidelines and also not remove it in defiance of these. gidonb (talk) 03:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC


 * Developer19801, Tapal2024, Juice00001, and Success302 follow the same username cadance.
 * Developer19801, Joshua Royal, and Mhagay follow the same userpage cadence.
 * Developer19801 is in both groups. gidonb (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU isn't especially useful here.
 * Tapal2024 is blatantly using proxies.
 * Joshua Royal, Developer19801, and Mhagay share the same unusual geolocation.
 * If a connection exists involving Juice00001 and Success302, it's MEAT.
 * The accounts in the Joshua Royal group share an obvious behavioural similarity, so I am going to block them. regarding the remaining accounts. Blocks for UPE aren't out of the question.  Spicy (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The AFD comments by the remaining two accounts are very suspect, but they fall a little shy of enough evidence for a block. No prejudice against re-filing if future edits are also sock-like. Closing. The Wordsmith Talk to me 01:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)