Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michaelm/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I noticed that this edit by MikeM735 is identical to this by Michaelm.

Both usernames are very similar, so I reviewed their past interaction, which reveals overlap on various other unrelated subjects: vs ; vs ; vs

Michaelm was previously blocked for amongst other things socking. TDL (talk) 03:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Well that really is about as clear-cut as you can ever hope for in terms of identical edits to disparate topics. You know what's even more clear-cut than that? Special:PageHistory/Fabuloso. Seems they waited seven months and then fired up a sock to restart all the edit wars they lost pre-indef, at least five based on Fabuloso and the four pairs of diffs presented. Remarkable. : Please block MikeM735 as a proven sock of Michaelm. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 05:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Alison @Tamzin @Danlaycock any idea who they were blocked for socking way back in 2007? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Firstly, is ✅ as being a sock of . As to the question, it's over 15 years ago and lost in the mists of time :/ -  A l is o n  ❤ 17:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)