Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mickey Darwin/Archive

Evidence submitted by Nate38
had askes for sex via her deleted talk page. This was taken to WP:ANI where he was blocked. Moments later, appeared and asked  for sex via her talk page. Obviously the same person via the name. Nate38 (talk) 07:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
All accounts indef'd, including the filer. Nothing more to do here at this time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by AaronLibertyCity
Username and edit pattern. AaronLibertyCity (talk) 08:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Duncan
Evasion block; cannot submit evidence tangible, but the rapidity at which it jumped on the SPI and redirected to an admin's page is fishy. — Duncan What I Do / What I Say 10:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
aaron liberty city niko bellic is obviously mickey darwin. i'm not mickey darwin. Mick Darwin (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Not really coz I dont pervert others. AaronLibertyCity (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

but you do aaron bellic. i'm not mickey darwin goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronLibertyCity (talk • contribs) 08:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

lol what a queer

Can an admin please block the retard above? AaronLibertyCity (talk) 09:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * A check for Mick Darwin and also the filer please.  B s a d o w s k i 1   09:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked both. Per poor man's checkuser these two are definitely on the same IP. T. Canens (talk) 09:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report
 * more listed on yesterday's report

Evidence submitted by Tnxman307
Brand-new account requesting lifting of protection of this page, definitely not a new user. Requesting a sleeper check as well. TN X Man 16:35, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
. I'm finding Baby Peter Zaire's actions suspicious like the previous reporters. Also would it be possible to get an IP block? He/she seems to be circumventing their autoblocks.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 16:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I've already blocked the Darwin socks per similar usernames.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 16:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Added a few blocked socks, and there's more listed yesterday. They're fresh accounts there may not be sleepers. An IP block would be handy though. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Has naturally been looked into, but can't help with that. RBI. Amalthea  19:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking as . RBI indeed, they'll get bored eventually. -- Luk  talk 20:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)