Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mikedonald711/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

By this IP:

By Mikedonald711:

All of which use the same style of poorly-written edit summaries with no evidence to back up those edits. This is also being done to get around a recent block against the suspected sockpuppeteer. Creativity-II (talk) 03:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Given the behavioral evidence provided, I agree that the user has been evading a block with the IP. I have increased the current block to 3 months and hard blocked the IP for 1 week. Mike V • Talk 17:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

IP poster:

Mikedonald711:

Both edits use poorly-written edit summaries and the sockpuppeteer listed is using IPs to get around a block against him for unsourced edits and creating hoax articles. Creativity-II (talk) 06:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * yep, the IP is recreating the same edits the master was blocked for. Geez, the master's three-month block would have expired tomorrow, and such a minor thing to not be able to wait a day over. Please give the master a fresh six month block, and block the IP one week. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 23:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This unsourced edit at CBAT-DT and this user contribution history, which matches the poorly-written edit summary style of these previous edits  and the contribution history  of Mikedonald711. Suspect IP sock and block evasion by Mikedonald711. 2001:569:BD1A:CD00:9498:6CC2:3984:A0BC (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked for 1 month. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CJON-DT&type=revision&diff=951639897&oldid=951636733&diffmode=source Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I just protected the page. Easier. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This edit at CBNT-DT and this user contribution history, which matches the poorly-written edit summary style of these similar edits  and the contribution history  of Mikedonald711. 2001:569:74D2:A800:ADF3:46:A426:4D6F (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌ for 1 month per behavioral evidence. I've also semi-protected CJON-DT for 2 months. Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger  talk   09:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same style of edit summaries as the master and previous IPs; this IP also that the list of "second" television stations licensed c. 1960–61 in the CTV Television Network article cannot include CBXT (contrary to any surrounding context that makes it clear that it is not directly a list of the early CTV stations),.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  01:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked for clear evasion. Mkdw  talk 14:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
I was recently tipped off on my talk page to this IP that insists that the CTV Television Network article's list of "second" television stations in Canadian cities licensed in 1961 despite the context making it clear the two lists diverge in Edmonton. This is a longstanding insistence and  (which was the last report in the archive, as it happens). Their edit summary style does not appear to have changed much in the nearly two years since the last report, either.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  19:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP appears to be stale, but I think the report was good based on those diffs. Consider using AIV for DUCK activity. Izno (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)