Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MilWards/Archive

09 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edit warring on Nathalie Handal while logged in and logged out making BLP violation and breaking 3RR. Shrike (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * Generally, checkusers will not disclose connections between IPs and named accounts. However, the behavior alone (absent any technical data) seems to draw a pretty clear connection between the IP and the accounts. TN X Man  14:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked MW 1 week, IP 2 weeks, and sock indef. Keilana | Parlez ici 03:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * NatHandal has been in touch with OTRS about working on her issues with her article, and we managed to engage discussion just yesterday on her article. Looking over the page history and the talk page histories, I believe that the account has had trouble because we've been hostile about the subject to begin with.  I'm disappointed with the lack of assuming good faith without gauging the what happened in the edits and what the community response was, which was "DISRUPTION!  BLOCK!"  until someone violates policy without even knowing simply to try to correct something about themselves.  I'm embarrassed by our behavior here.   Keegan (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked MW 1 week, IP 2 weeks, and sock indef. Keilana | Parlez ici 03:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * NatHandal has been in touch with OTRS about working on her issues with her article, and we managed to engage discussion just yesterday on her article. Looking over the page history and the talk page histories, I believe that the account has had trouble because we've been hostile about the subject to begin with.  I'm disappointed with the lack of assuming good faith without gauging the what happened in the edits and what the community response was, which was "DISRUPTION!  BLOCK!"  until someone violates policy without even knowing simply to try to correct something about themselves.  I'm embarrassed by our behavior here.   Keegan (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)