Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Milodarka Cicimil/Archive

13 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All of the accounts listed in question are vandalism only accounts,, , ,. Having vandalized, each account in question has then engaged in a repetitive, targeted and continual harassment of the editor Frosty on his talkpage, with a repeated series of similar incidents over several days, ,. TF92 (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * TF92 really stated pretty much all there is to state in terms of diffs and identifying accounts, however I am perhaps just a little skeptical. By skeptical I mean, I am not sure that they are all the same person beyond reasonable doubt. Why? My time on Wikipedia is spent reverting vandals and vandals inevitably go and attack the user that reverted them (I am one of hundreds of editors this has happened to over the years). All I'm saying is, yes all these accounts are vandal only accounts, abusive and thus deserving of blocks, but all the same person? I find it quite likely that either scenario could be the case: 1 person or 4 entirely separate people. Either way, they have been rightly so blocked.
 * Don't get me wrong, I'm all for doing a CheckUser if people believe that there is enough evidence to warrant one, I'm just skeptical of them all being one person. —Frosty ☃ 22:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All four accounts are blocked for vandalism now, so I'm closing the case. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)