Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mines32/Archive

Report date April 12 2009, 01:36 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * Evidence submitted by Momusufan (talk)

I checked the history for Talim and there appears to be a connection to a user named User:Mines32 and all the IP's I have listed above. Mines32 and the IP's are making the same exact edits to the article looking between 2 diffs. One on December 2, 2008 and on April 12, 2009. They are making Nationalism Original Research edits againest consensus in the talk page. According to the Soul Caliber game manual, The fictional character was born in Southeast asia before the Philppines existed. The article is semi-protected again for a month to stop these IP's from their disruptive editing.

Also see Talk:Talim Momusufan (talk) 22:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by User:Kung Fu Man This has been ongoing for quite some time with the same results: article's protection expires, any edit done to the article results in the return of the IPs and they continue to revert well beyond the 3RR limit, until the article is protected once more. Looking at the srticle's history will clearly show protection alone is not working. Discussion on the talk page went nowhere either with the related IPs. So no, temporary semi-protection isn't sufficing.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

Requested by Momusufan (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Checkuser is needed to check and see that Mines32 has used any of these IP's including 58.69.117.77 and 58.69.119.68 which were used recently. Momusufan (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * The listed account hasn't edited the page noted since January 7th and not at all since February. Since the IP editing comes from multiple ranges, targets 1 article and no current accounts are involved, the semiprotection seems sufficient. Avruch  T 18:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Article was semi protected. Nothing left to do here.  Syn  ergy 15:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

 Syn  ergy 15:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions