Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mipesom/Archive

Evidence submitted by BajanZindy
Suspected sockpuppetry and WP:SPA, see talkpage Nev1. Hope to act correctly. BajanZindy (talk) 11:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Here's the permanent link for when my talk page eventually gets archived. Nev1 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
I agree the edits are similar and duckish, but I have to ask, why is there an edit war over picture size? Sailsbystars (talk) 17:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. While the full sized picture looks better the style itself looks much better with the small size.  Nonetheless, I think this may qualify for an entry on WP:LAME. Sailsbystars (talk) 17:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * MOS:IMAGE says "Lead images, which should usually be no wider than " " (" ")"; this is so it doesn't take up too much space on the smallest common screen resolution (600x400). I think a good solution would be to crop the sides of the image so it's more focussed on the subject, but edit warring against the manual of style is a dead end. Nev1 (talk) 18:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅; appears Mipesom is using Wolf747 account to make reverts and avoid WP:3RR. Frank  |  talk  17:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * blocked indef by . I think this can be closed. Tiptoety  talk 18:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I left Mipesom a warning about sockpuppeting. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)