Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mirković Staša/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
! promotion duck. Pavlov2 (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The first user user:Mirković Staša make promotion edits on the second user user:Mirlović Staša 2009's User page and it's so duckable.
 * Please block the socks if possible. Pavlov2 (talk) 13:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar username to sockmaster and previous sock (Mirlović Staša 2009). Edited userpage of sockmaster: Special:Diff/1079093727/1079550673. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * : Sdrqaz (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
See Special:Diff/1087744426 by User:PAVLOV. Sdrqaz (talk) 12:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sdrqaz (talk) 12:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Staša Mirković spam, see user's sandbox and userpage of one of the blocked socks – NJD-DE (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already locked. I don't see the point in blocking locally, and I've their page per G5. For the record, there are some other accounts that have been locked without tags:  I personally don't see the point of tagging any of them (or the one reported today), and have received differing advice from clerks. If the archiving clerk wants to, by all means, but I'm closing this without tags. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
(Quack, looks like a duck) Creating user pages that seem to line up with those created by the other socks, in which Staša Mirković is mentioned, a picture is added, and a bunch of famous people are listed as relatives in an infobox. The Tecna and Musa accounts have had their user pages deleted from a CSD (by me), with Tecna's having been deleted three times.

The user page of Bloom Mirković still shows the infobox, as it hasn't been deleted yet. If you are able to view deleted edits you'll see what I mean by the user pages of the Tecna and Musa accounts. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Understood, no tagging user pages moving forward. Thank you for looking into this. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . . I noticed that you have also tagged some of them . Generally speaking, please leave tagging for clerks and administrators. I don't believe that tagging is very useful for this case. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for understanding, Josh, and for reporting. If you think that an account should be tagged, you can ask at the clerks' noticeboard, a random clerk (or CheckUser), or the blocking administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
WP:DUCK - Their user page and name match the pattern. Always listing famous people as family, Staša Mirković as the "name" in the infobox on the user page, and including some variation of the original puppeteer's name in the user name. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ., case closed. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Textbook duck. Same user page set up as the rest of them and name styling. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . . Sdrqaz (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
As with my previous report of them, textbook duck. Same user page set up as the rest of them and name styling. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Now blocked. Requested lock, closing. Spicy (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
WP:DUCK - Their user page and name match the pattern. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Also: I blocked Staša Mirković October on their own merits, and then today Сташа Мирковић Нормана as a reincarnation of ...October, before I saw this SPI and that it's a larger pool. DMacks (talk) 13:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Now blocked and locked. Spicy (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Special:Diff/1114854857 and Special:Diff/1106003246 – unconstructive editing similar to User:Staša Mirković Tik tok (Special:Diff/1106003540/1106036537) and User:Staša Mirkovć Grande (Special:Diff/1113894028) —⁠andrybak (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already globally locked, so no further action is required. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar unconstructive editing at Template talk:Infobox person: Special:Diff/1115198940. —⁠andrybak (talk) 08:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . ; closing case. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Behavioral: the usual spam at — hike395 (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
 * Requested lock on SRG@Hike395 Lemonaka (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * locks requested (not by me). Case closed. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)