Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Miss.Indecisive/Archive

12 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit-warring at Jessica Biel and then claiming that "more than one editor" was making changes: (also note the edit marked as minor without an edit summary, even though the edit was known to be controversial)

Making the same edit at Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, and then pretending that she didn't know why it kept being changed and that "another editor shares my view":

Both IPs are Australian. DrKiernan (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Declining this request. Both IPs being Australian is not a reason for assuming socking or requesting a check; they're different ISPs, which you probably know because you obviously verified that they were both from Australia. In any case, there is no evidence at all that the two IPs are related.  This is obviously a stylistic preference issue, and I note the inconsistency between the Duchess of Cambridge article and those of other women in the British royal family. Remember that even an experienced editor may occasionally make a logged-out edit, and we're not going to call "socks" on them; instead, it would be more community-minded to ask the editor if perhaps they edited logged out and then point them to User:Oversight if they'd like their IP suppressed.  Recommend discussing the stylistic preference issue on the talk page of the article.  Risker (talk) 04:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with stylistic preference. It is a behavioral issue. DrKiernan (talk) 06:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)