Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mjp2515/Archive

Report date August 20 2009, 12:14 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Per WP:DUCK. Obviously the same name, creating the exact same articles as the sock master, who was blocked yesterday. Until It Sleeps Wake me 12:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Until It Sleeps Wake me


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Blocked and tagged. — Jake   Wartenberg  15:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Archiving. NW ( Talk ) 15:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date August 20 2009, 10:21 (UTC)
The disruption caused by Mjp2515 is pretty obvious, as it resulted in his receiving an indefinite block. As for him being Ladgy, note:
 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * Evidence submitted by Kww
 * Evidence submitted by Kww
 * recreation of article that was the topic of Ladgy's vote fraud
 * strange talk page message from Mjp2515
 * strange talk page message to Mjp2515 from Ladgy
 * What appears to be Ladgy distancing himself from the actions of the Mjp2515 account.


 * Additional info: Note that another editor has created Sockpuppet investigations/Mjp2515 after I opened this report.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Cases merged together. NW ( Talk ) 15:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 10:21, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * This could be possibly Meatpuppetry, but a checkuser is needed to confirm. NW ( Talk ) 17:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

To me, it looks like both of these users have some nice little sockfarms going.

✅ =

✅ =

J.delanoy gabs adds 20:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Could you guys please hold on a bit before tagging and blocking please? Behavioral evidence doesn't seem to match the checkuser results, so I'm getting a second opinion from one of our older checkusers. NW ( Talk )
 * Blocked indef and tagged the updated results. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 01:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note that the results on Ladgy had been reported previously, and a block had expired. The account was blocked again based on this report, but has been unblocked since no new evidence of socking had surfaced following the previous block. <strong style="color:#0033CC">Nathan <strong style="color:#0033CC"> T 21:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 3 2009, 02:49 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Daedalus969

Please compare the following diffs:
 * The above user is ridiculing other users. I will perhaps raise an ANI if it continues! - Stess mine, to highlight the relevant speech patterns. Take note that the user immediately finds the userpage of N5iln, which recently was in conflict with the suspected sock master.
 * That is besides the point. Another user took control of the talk page for my user. Want me to raise an ANI?
 * Shut off your bot or i will raise an ANI

They talk the same, secondly, here are two that are very close:


 * 
 * 

This evidence leads me to believe that Dracula is the sock master and was using goodhand-badhand accounts, although Dracula doesn't have any real constructive edits either, they're editing style is too similar to be coincidence.—  Dæ dαlus <sup style="color:green;">Contribs  02:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

perhaps might be the master. Brandon (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * This is a really messy range, I've taken out a few vandal accounts just looking for socks and soft blocked the range. to be the same person:


 * Conclusions


 * Blocked by PeterSymonds and tagged. <strong style="color:#0033CC">Nathan <strong style="color:#0033CC"> T 18:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Report date October 30 2009, 00:46 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Both created MR MJP or some variation thereof (admins: 1, 2). Another sock is User:Mjp.09, but he is blocked. To any admin: If the pages are completely different, please state this Intelligent  sium  00:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Intelligent  sium 


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Blocked and tagged. Deleted article salted by another admin. MuZemike 02:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions