Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mmoreno25/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Pro forma report (filing purely for the record). This is a cross-wiki sockmaster that primarily targets eswiki, but as you can see, their sockpuppetry has extended to enwiki as well. They often use enwiki user talk pages to contact editors on eswiki. Mz7 (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts ✅ except for Mmoreno25, which is stale. I am filing under Mmoreno25 because this is the name of the eswiki sockmaster (checkusers, see also ) and because Artisyukil is already blocked as a sockpuppet of Mmoreno25., closing. Mz7 (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * for Namefool, Namefool67, and Clarence Dixon Tools, who were not yet locked. Mz7 (talk) 21:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Ran a check following evidence from another CU. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 18:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pro forma. ✅. . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 18:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same talk page spamming as, also blocked as a sock of this user AntiDionysius  ( talk ) 10:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ONIJ blocked. Izno (talk) 22:02, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

User logged out or did not log in to edit their own !vote.diff1 This is allowed, showing to prove it is the same user. Then submitted at least two !votes in an AfD.diff2diff3diff4 Even after such behavior was corrected by me (SPI was not my first choice), they insisted that they were eligible to !vote twice.diff4diff5 Please note that I also supported a keep here. Still, I want articles to be kept for the right reasons and all opinions to receive a fair shot. Including that of the nominator, who thought the article should be deleted. gidonb (talk) 22:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please move to Sockpuppet investigations/Mmoreno25. Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Done. 0x Deadbeef →∞ (talk to me) 08:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, and global lock requested. The IPs are not worth blocking at this point. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)