Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Modulor1/Archive

01 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

A series of new accounts have suddenly turned up at the Circumcision article, all oddly familiar with Wikipedia, and all supporting each other. Even more strangely, an IP showed up on the Talk: page a couple of days before the new accounts, warning that this would happen. I think this is all suspicious enough to warrant a CU. Jayjg (talk) 23:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looks like Jayjg was asking for a checkuser here, so I've added one. This could also be meatpuppetry, but I guess we'll see. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The other two accounts appear technically ❌ to each other and the accounts in the list. TN X Man  13:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved this case to reflect Modulor1 as the master, as it's the oldest of all the accounts listed. I've blocked and tagged all the confirmed accounts. As to the other two.. maybe they're meatpuppets? That's basically the only other conclusion I can draw from their contributions. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

15 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After a warning that the Circumcision article would be inundated by anti-circumcision activists, a series of new and intermittently used accounts showed up there. Most were traced to two sockpuppeters, User:Zinbarg and User:Modulor1. After the Modulor1 socks were blocked, User:kyledueck showed up and started editing the article (and a related one) from the same POV. Since the latest Zinbarg sock was blocked today, this is likely a Modulor1 sock. Jayjg (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Possible, but since this is a somewhat old account, I'll endorse for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 07:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears that Kyledueck is ❌ to the previous accounts. TN X Man  13:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Based on the result of the CU, I'm going to close (at least at SPI) as no action required. If issues regarding this new user (who appear unrelated to the master account) appear problematic again, it can be listed at a forum such as ANI.  Steven Zhang  <sup style="color:#FFCC00;">The clock is ticking....  23:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)