Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohit.chawla29/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The suspected sock was inactive since March suddenly reappeared just after was blocked and removed the prod including  after some failed attempts by their. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 08:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * per behavioral evidence. Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger  talk   03:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Would a clerk please move this discussion under, the older of the two accounts? Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   05:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * - To check for any further sleepers. If Robertsatya is a sockpuppet, they are a sleeper. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 *  Maxim (talk)  22:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Leaving this for the next clerk. I'm unsure about the link between Robertsatya and other socks. Specifically their comment on the talk page before they were blocked gives me concern this is not a sock and is simply a user swept up in this, as the reason for editing the page so close after seems reasonable to me. Robertsatya's style also seems different to the other socks, but I may have missed something. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for requesting a CheckUser scan. Considering that the scan did not find a technical link between Robertsatya and, in addition to Robertsatya's convincing explanation in , I have unblocked Robertsatya and apologized for the error. Next time, I will request CheckUser in a situation like this. —  Newslinger  talk   05:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd like to add something. Everything says to me that Robertsatya is unrelated here and I agree with the unblock. Mohit.chawla29 is . Darkwolf0010 is confirmed to Nightwolf10 and Darkworlf0010, although technically that is no policy violation in itself, and it is highly likely that is related to Darkwolf0010, although meatpuppetry can't be ruled out. All things considered I can't see a strong basis for any blocks for sockpuppetry here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Nothing more to do. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)