Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monica Samille Lewinsky/Archive

08 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Apparently there is no SPI case page for the master account, and the first two socks are blocked, but now it seems there is a new account in need of blocking. New account's only edits are to add "hi" to Driplivia's user page. Between the name and the actions it sure looks like a duck to me. &#124; Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, well, the newest has been blocked. Didn't mean to waste your time. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There are a whack of additional accounts here. I'll update the SPI shortly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are all ✅ to each other:


 * All are now blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All tagged and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * All untagged and pages deleted. Let's not tag accounts named after real people.  Trashing the pages keeps them out of search engines. Courcelles (talk) 04:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * '''Incredible work. Thanks. Quis separabit?  03:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)