Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monte Melkonian/Archive

13 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Vidovler came very soon after this sock person User:Mark Barsky was at last denied many times to be unblocked by admins. Read his page discussion: User talk:Mark Barsky (Contributions:). I remind you that Mark Barsky is a sockpupet of User talk:Monte Melkonian who also was blocked for the same nationalist additions on pages like Monte Melkonian. Now when he can not operate any more Vidovler came. For example he undid my return to neutral version and said in summary "Oo Someone should check this user, he's removing verifiable sources". Then he was blocked by admins, and then Vidovler came undoing admin Daniel and saying almost the same blaming me for restoration of neutral version: "Dighabet is removing sourced informations, see talk".

I made a report last time: Sockpuppet_investigations/Meowy/Archive which found many socks. Please check these persons, their actions are suspicious. By the way User:Mov25 was found sock of User:MosMusy (who deleted information about block to rid of suspicions]). My question is why is MosMusy able to edit now if he's guilty of using socks which was already proved? Dighapet (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Vidovler has been checked before and is ❌ to Monte Melkonian. TN X Man 23:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Nonetheless, I've blocked the account. These two edits are identical, so something is going on. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)