Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Monthandme/Archive

Evidence submitted by JohnBlackburne
An IP and two accounts whose sole purpose in life seems to be to add surplus information to a DAB page, Thirteenth Amendment, usually ungrammatically, with increasingly annoying edit summaries - lastly mentioning 3RR which of course sockpuppetry neatly sidesteps. The second IP is one which thoughtfully put in a password request for me, 1 minute after the last change. Diffs:     -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * both users tried to warn this user not to vandalize, instead of talking about the problem on the talk page as the rules demand, johnblackburne is violating rules 24/7by 3rr and posting here without having courage to talk about it.
 * I have addressed the content issues on the talk page in more detail, to make it clear why the changes made were wrong.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 22:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * that is illegal, i can explain same things on anybody's talk page, he simply keeps on making things up, wasting people's time on silly issue, im sure there are more he cant wait to invent!

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
 * this individual john blackburne is reverting basic facts on the 13th amendement saying its too much info & providing bogus link to support his claims, i suggest john blackburne to be punished for violations of basic rules & basic logic!
 * I added fact on 1865, he did not like that, it's clear this guy is trying to become administrator, blocking me, i dont care if that happens, but users need to look at this individual's real motivations. It's silly to argue on couple of words, yet blackburne does it all the time with all other users, his edits must be perfect ofcourse!
 * good edits like this are vandalism according to blackburne, warning, this guy should never ever become administrator or anythin else: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirteenth_Amendment&diff=350672397&oldid=350664877

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Monthandme (talk • contribs) 21:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Civilonenotyou indefinitely blocked and tagged, Monthandme (whom I'll designate as the sockmaster even though Civilonenotyou is older) blocked 2 weeks for edit warring and sock puppetry. The person should really pay heed to WP:NOTTHEM. –MuZemike 00:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Moved from Sockpuppet investigations/Civilonenotyou due to change in sockmaster. Tag for Civilonenotyou changed to sock of Monthandme. Elockid ( Talk·Contribs ) 01:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


. Sigh.

Evidence submitted by JohnBlackburne
-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 20:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Self-endorsing for CU attention due to continued harassment. –MuZemike 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks ✅/; looks like other checkusers/admins have set a few IP blocks relating to this. – Luna Santin  (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * has been blocked and tagged, SpitfireTally-ho! 12:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by JohnBlackburne
A new IP, but once again on Thirteenth Amendment:, same inappropriate change, another ungrammatical edit summary. -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Already blocked by Antandrus as a clear sock. –MuZemike 21:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * And Thirteenth Amendment has been semi-protected 1 week. –MuZemike 21:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by JohnBlackburne
etc. -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
blocked and tagged SpitfireTally-ho! 22:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Tim Song
See below, from. T. Canens (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by PMDrive1061
Troll from some idiotic Wikipedia watch site. Quite possible there are more socks lurking about. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thinly disguised sock User:BoxinWear just blocked as well. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by T. Canens (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC) That's actually (SPI). ✅ & blocked all other ones are already blocked. Amalthea 18:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Got another one: Ian.thomson (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Amalthea  19:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by PMDrive1061
Usual illiterate ED nonsense singing the praises of some worthless anti-Wikipedia page on his user page. Definitely passes the duck test and there's almost certainly more than one whenever these pop up.PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC) ✅ All already blocked, but do keep reporting them. Amalthea 15:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * All done. TN X Man  15:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)