Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mousanonyy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts have a long history of fighting an obscure battle at Talk:India

The Pppooojjjaaa to be fighting this battle for two years when the account was only six months old. had to revdel some BLP/copyvios from this account after which it was "abandoned". Right after that, the original account popped up to support the points of the first one in the disputes. Mousanonyy:, , , Pppoooojjjaaa:, , , The overlapping fetishes on articles as diverse as India and Alia Bhat indicate a very loud quack. I'm an editor of India, so I can't take any action and this is likely linked to a bigger sock farm, so bringing here. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  00:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * THanks Doc, I'm WP:INVOLVED, so waiting for the next passing admin to handle this. Based on CU findings below, I'm chaning the status to "checked" so that an admin can continue the action. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Wow...I didn't quite expect an editor who is so newbish to be capable of even doing this...they posted on archives instead of the main talk page. The master is years old and yet did that very same thing long time ago. Still didn't know...Probably the few socks that are found that are so newbish, they're harmless and even without malice.

As usual, commend Spiff's ability to detect socks (by their smell?) :) Ugog Nizdast (talk) 04:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Spiffy, it's a total match, according to CU. Draw your own conclusions; I got some childcare stuff to do. :) Drmies (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * User:SpacemanSpiff, I'm not in a blocking mood right now, and I do not believe you are involved because of the India stuff. I also don't rightly know what to do besides indef blocks. Oh, I did not find evidence of a larger farm, but I'm an amateur, haha. Drmies (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I've indefed the sock and blocked the master for one month. Spiff, imo, confirmed SPI blocks don't have involved issues. --regentspark (comment) 14:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

blocked the earlier sock when I'd asked here but I don't think a sweep was run so this one was left out, this has come back to revisit the same issue again. . Compare to:,. The IP claims to be the user, so a duck block is needed there. Since these are all old accounts, a sweep is needed this time. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Mousanonyy and Motbag12 are ❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Unrelated to original master. As the IP admits to being Motbag12 and they were not blocked at the time there is no evasion. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 20:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)