Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mpmccart/Archive

Report date May 13 2009, 16:42 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Seems like double accounts, perhaps to get around LimeLife being a clear COI for editing LimeLife? First User:Mpmccart adds LimeLife as a Film Project participant and when its reverted, User:Limelife editor pops in a few hours to add himself again. Both accounts actively spamming LimeLife links to various articles -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs)
 * Also added User:Limelife, another editor with similar name, similar behaviors, active on the LimeLife article. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Update, LimeLife_editor has confirmed he is a representative of the company and is using it for promotional purposes-- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 18:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests
 * All accounts have been blocked, and I see no suspicion of sleepers. If more show up, please refile. Limelife editor is the only recent sock, as no others would be fresh from that article.  Syn  ergy 22:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * I'm with Synergy on this one - the article look like it will be deleted, so SPA sleepers aren't a major concern. Nathan  T (formerly Avruch) 22:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

No checkuser necessary, in my opinion--this is as obvious as it gets. All accounts blocked. Blueboy96 20:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * It might be good to make sure we got them all. Looking at the SPA hits to LimeLife, I suspect there are a few more in there. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks fine to me. All accounts blocked and tagged.  Archiving.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  22:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)