Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mquillig/Archive

16 September 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There are an abundance of single-purpose, low-edit-count members attempting to lend IMO undue gravitas to the subject of the very lightly-trafficked "How to Read Donald Duck", several of whose edits are posted with similar wordy commentaries. It is possible that the master sock isn't listed here, but is another, more seemingly reputable editor of the topic. The last several years' revision activity fits on one page, so further checking shouldn't be difficult, I would think. Froglich (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I can't see any basis for a check here. Checkusers won't (or more accurately rarely) comment on IPs and is stale as it hasn't edited since 2011. Of the two current accounts,  made a single edit to the article, which they self-reverted, and there is no actual evidence of any link to  outside of that single edit to a common article.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing per Ponyo's comment. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  20:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)