Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Johnson SI/Archive

25 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Once is coincidence, but it's happened multiple times. Today is the obvious one: at 23:48, the article was semi-protected because of disruption by. At 23:48, within a minute of the protection, Mr Johnson SI logged in to revert the article.

The same pattern happened on 13 June, albeit with more lag between the semi-protection and the logged-in edit.

The behaviour has occurred across multiple articles. Always consistent is changing police officer in a New York State law enforcement agency's article to peace officer or deleting any mention of the word police. For further examples, check the histories of: There's a long history of bits and pieces of suggestive evidence. Today, however, it became a lot more obvious. Further, since the registered account and many of the IPs have received warnings, the use of IPs is abusive, as it's an attempt to avoid sanctions for inappropriate editing. —C.Fred (talk) 04:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's stale at this point. Re-report if it becomes an issue again. NativeForeigner Talk 20:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

06 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts are active at. Mr Johnson SI picked up right where the IP left off--literally if you look at this morning, where the IP made edits to its talk page at 01:40 and 02:13 but the logged in account edited the article at 01:46. As I noted before, this is not the first time that Mr Johnson SI and an IP address have doubled up on an article like that, and typically it's been when one of them has neared three reverts. —C.Fred (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These two are obviously the same user. I'm not seeing any overt 3RR violations, so I'm not going to block him. Feel free to report edit warring to the edit warring noticeboard. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2013 (UTC)