Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr Liffee/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Between 2000-01-01 and 2021-03-04 on en.wikipedia.org User:Mr Liffee (talk | contribs) and User:るあー (talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser.

Also, see their filter logs.

Firestar464 (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * idk man im not sockpuppeting? xd idk why you would think this. if you can provide some evidence other than linking to this user's page that would be nice.Mr Liffee (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on the interaction TL and the edit filter log of yours, the behavioral evidence is strong. Please let me know if you think otherwise, and why. Thank you and happy editing! Firestar464 (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry if i sound stupid but what is an edit filter log? Mr Liffee (talk) 12:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, if my account was never given any punishments for vandalism or anything why would I use another account to vandalise as if I got banned on another account? Mr Liffee was first active ages before 'るあー' and only had its created pages deleted. I don't understand why you think I would use another account to vandalise a source of infinite knowledge for all. If you can actually provide any legitimate evidence for why you believe this is definitely me using this account then I will tell you why you are wrong again. Do you think it's me because I edited their user page and then reverted it instantly? I probably just saw them in the edit history of a page and thought they needed a little tap on the shoulder to stop whatever the hell they were doing. Mr Liffee (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "I probably just saw them in the edit history of a page and thought they needed a little tap on the shoulder to stop whatever the hell they were doing." I don't think that's how you do it. Firestar464 (talk) 02:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What about the barnstar you sent them? Firestar464 (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't remember why I sent that but I don't think editing someone's user page means that you are that user. I still don't think I've seen any evidence that I am sockpuppeting other than the fact that I edited their page. There has to be some other reason you suspect me of sockpuppeting? Mr Liffee (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not known why else ML would troll suspected sock's TP. Firestar464 (talk) 02:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The suspected sock is stale for CheckUser purposes. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 00:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Leaving a message on somebody else's talk page is not enough to prove somebody is a sock. Closing with no action taken. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)