Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr bott1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
"Salmaelfassi" is a new editor that I never interacted with, yet most of their edit summaries are disturbing personal attack against me.

In these two comments (see diff1 and diff2) that they made after their block, they explain that I reverted their edits on the Pastilla article; but when you check the article's history, you'll notice that the only editor that I interacted with lately is the sockmaster. M.Bitton (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * I just asked to create this investigation if they think the same as I do; it turns out the investigation was already created. Checkuser would be really helpful here, as the technical data would make the difference between blocking or not blocking . The behavioral similarity seems to justify a check, yet isn't obvious enough to quickly block. A clearer behavioral connection, username similarity included, exists between  and . I have already tagged these two and blocked  before reconsidering that  may be another sock. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a short in the dark, but given the fact that they also edited Fez (hat) and Djellaba, they could well be related to Sl99dl. M.Bitton (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * This might need to be consolidated with Sockpuppet investigations/SamirJawhara. Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Mr bott1 and Salmaelfassi are ❌. I can see the behavioral similarity between Salmaelfassi and SamirJawhara, but given the long gap in time between the activity of those two accounts, it's hard to say for certain. Closing this case without action. No objection if a clerk wishes to merge this case to the existing SamirJawhara case, as Liz suggests, but I also think archiving the case as-is is fine too. Mz7 (talk) 03:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)