Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammadahmad79/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

blocked Wikieditor7799 on July and Wikieditor6699 was created on July as well.

Apart from similar names, they both are highly interested on Awan (tribe) and Golden temple. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 10:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The data on the previous socks accounts is stale, but the socking is very obvious. In addition, Wikieditor6699 created the sleeper account, which I've also blocked. Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same POV pushing on Awan (tribe) as previous socks:


 * "Opinion of the majority of the scholars is that the tribe is of Arabic origin" - Muhammadahmad79
 * "it automatically means that Awans are of Arab origin" - Wildhorse3


 * "reverted to last best version"


 * Restoring same content on Awan (tribe):


 * Same "Awan" POV on Qutb Shah.

This account was created after 1 month after the last sock was blocked here.

might be aware. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 20:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

But why only this user has to be the only one who restores same edits all the time on multiple articles after getting blocked on earlier socks? It is clearly him since popped up only after earlier socks were blocked.
 * I found another account which is and has similarities both with master and suspected sock:


 * "The haplogroup T1(originated in the Middle East countries) was only recorded in Awans"
 * "Similarly, haplogroup T is a haplogroup of Arab origin,"


 * Check it and tell. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Generally yes, but according to my experience allows comments before the SPI is archived. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What little historical data exists says this is, but I'm not seeing enough behavioral similarity to justify a block. I see a few style differences which suggest they're different people who live in the same area and thus, not surprisingly, share certain viewpoints.  Closing with no action. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This report has been closed (as you can tell by the grey banner just under the date). Whilst you are welcome to ask questions in relation to the existing report, any new accounts you wish to list will need to be filed in a separate SPI report. Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)