Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muhammadyeakubhasan111/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Shortly after the main account submitted its opinion at an AfD on an article which it had created, it was joined by similar opinions from the IP and then the two new accounts ,  AllyD (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * There is a curious one-hour gap in Muhammad's editing history - a gap which coincides with the named accounts' three total edits. In addition, their writing has the same idiosyncrasies, making this a fairly open-and-shut case even without Checkuser. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 09:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Got another one for you. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 09:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I took a look anyway to see if there were any other accounts jumping out. The three accounts are ✅, no comment on the IP; indef for socks, and for the master since they are engaged in obvious promotional editing, and have created socks in a bad faith attempt to influence a deletion discussion. Closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  09:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Created Draft:Anudip Foundation; see the deleted Anudip Foundation and the socking at Articles for deletion/Anudip Foundation. User:Askmuhammad/sandbox states "My name is muhammad yeakub hasan........". DanCherek (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
 
 * I added whom was reported in the previous SPI and tagged as confirmed. But looking at the timing and comments was not CU'd or blocked. --Jack Frost (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * . However in light of the furious account creation - Please check  as compared to previous accounts, and consider whether there might have been any further accounts between the last check and now. --Jack Frost (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * is ✅, and I also see on the same narrow range. I don't understand why  is tagged - I didn't look at them in the previous case, I think that account was added after I performed the check? Anyway, from a technical perspective, they're nothing to connect them to the others.  Girth Summit  (blether)  11:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have de-tagged . Doesn't look like there's anything left to do. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Probably the easiest SPI you'll deal with today. Recreated Draft:Anudip Foundation. DanCherek (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ah, yep, that was pretty easy... . - Please block  as a sock. --Jack Frost (talk) 22:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Already handled by Explicit, closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Quickly recreated Draft:Anudip Foundation amongst their first edits. —Jéské Couriano v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 18:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * because all previous socks are now . However, based on behavior., closing. Mz7 (talk) 02:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)