Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muktar allebbey/Archive

22 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pretty straightforward case of block evasion. The newly-registered User:Muktar allebbey account was temporarily blocked on the 20th for the second time in one week for disruptive editing (nonsense edits, copy-vios, knee-jerk reverting admins, etc.). The just-registered User:3abdush then showed up within a few hours on the same obscure pages as the Muktar allebbey account and reverted back to the same copy-vios as the blocked Muktar allebbey account (e.g., ), and pretty much continued the same behavior. The 3abdush account also appears to be using a Swedish-geolocated anonymous IP 79.138.159.57 based on the fact that the IP posted minutes before the 3abdush account on the same obscure pages, as if the 3abdush account were logged out then logged back in. The 3abdush account also apparently approves of the IP's edits, which basically consist of adding spam from an online forum post (c.f., ).

Given the above and the ongoing history of disruption (besides the twice blocked Muktar allebbey account, every last article edit of the 3abdush account & the anon IP were reverted by admins), I would appreciate a Checkuser if possible. If confirmed, an indefinite ban I think is warranted at this point. Middayexpress (talk) 09:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . AGK  [&bull; ] 10:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Technically that these are the same.  AGK  [&bull; ] 10:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Blocks have been handed out already. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

10 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Muktar allebbey was indefinitely blocked on May 22, following edit warring at and subsequent block evasion. The Isaaq article was protected that same day. Five minutes after that, someone created the Omar kader account (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Omar+kader), and left an incomplete edit request at Talk:Isaaq. Today, Omar kader essentially restored the same content that Muktar allebbey had added in earlier versions, but for which there was no consensus reached (see Talk:Isaaq). Compare with. Thanks. Gyrofrog (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - because all of the contribs are stale. This will have to be decided on behavioral evidence.
 * . Blocked and tagged. Jafeluv (talk) 09:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

26 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It is time for this to finally come to and end. It seems that are "friend" Hadraa is none other than banned user Muktar allebbey. For starters, they both:


 * Edit the same articles: Muktar and Hadraa.


 * Have the same editing style, see here: Muktar and Hadraa.


 * Blocked consistently for edit warring: Muktar and Hadraa.


 * Denis any wrong doing when caught: Muktar and Hadraa.


 * Add the same poem: and a sock of Muktar

Sadly, the most compelling piece of evidence against him was sadly deleted by him. Check out this discussion here where the Hadraa links to an email that was sent to him. The coding in the email lists "muktar allebbey" as the receiver, and also includes his email address. When Hadraa realized this fatal mistake he deleted the image. If there's a way to recover this image it would greatly be appreciated! If more evidence is needed, then I will look for more. AcidSnow (talk) 23:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Not at all. AcidSnow (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This has been drawn out for quite some time Vanjagenije. AcidSnow (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * first of stop accusing me of someone that i am not ,second of all i used my real email to prove a point that is a Chinese document was a forgy so for the last time i have to be notifit about the case and stop acussing some one of what he is not . Hadraa (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * here are the copies of my email that i have but on line and like you can see i took out the ip address and name for that is private and contain sensitive staff, and you can use any sort of photoshop to write in any name or ip address you want its easy so don't be fooled and the hollow argument was a bout a fraud and forged that was used and i pointed out what it was you can see on again what is so easy like to write a person's name on a blank place in a letter is so easy icj 1 icj 2 like you can see ,and again i am not muktar like they accuse me of and i am tired of saying this again and again thanks Hadraa (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * to show you what i meant here is a copy of the same email with the name of [Steve Jobs ] RIP (1955-2011) has the receiver of the email as stevejobs@hotmail.com,example of name fraud

so you see its easy to fill the blank with any name like muktar alebey or AcidSnow or any name you want.thanksHadraa (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

3rv not true and he is angry about this report( AcidSnow reported by Hadraa).Hadraa (talk) 23:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I found copies of those e-mails. Since they are private and contain real names, I sent information to the functionaries mailing list. Putting this case on hold until the answer is received from the functionaries.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What's going on with this case? I sent an e-mail to the functionaries mailing list, which you confirmed you received. I think it's pretty conclusive.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Email reply on the way. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have replied to you reply.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What's going on with this case? I sent you files via e-mail that pretty much prove the sockpuppetry. You answered that the files are too small to read. Than, I sent you another e-mail explaining that some files are readable if you enlarge. That was 9 days ago.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I have been extremely busy with work, but I will try to look at them again today. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. I'm still waiting for to answer. I can't do anything by myself here.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  16:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * can somebody else review this? DoRD has been inactive for more than a week. I've sent two e-mail to the functionaries mailing list.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Technically bordering . Between that and the other information available, I'm convinced that this is a sock. Blocked and tagged. T. Canens (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

21 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

was blocked as a sock of Muktar allebbey today. A brand new user appears (registered two days ago, when Hadraa was already aware that he is going to be blocked). He continues the same edit war started by Hadraa about the map of Somaliland (Hadraa:, Dandaawi: ).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing my own request to compare Dandaawi with Hadraa.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The two accounts appear to be ❌. may want to take a look.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are editing from different countries in the same continent. Of course it's still theoretically possible, given that they are editing ~1 week apart, but there's nothing damning from the technical evidence. T. Canens (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)