Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MunirUtubi/Archive

05 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Clear WP:DUCK. Both accounts created on 5 January. Both Intra3829 and MunirUtubi's first actions were to create their talk pages and user pages with only their name. For Intra, see: user page and talk page. For MunirUtubi, see: user page and talk page. Their only article space edits have been to add unverified figures to a contentious article (Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen). They had exactly the same edits. First, MunirUtubi tried changing the infobox with this edit:. Then, after he/she was reverted, the MunirUtubi account made the same exact change:. I believe he/she deceptively made a new account to give the impression of bolstered support for their preferred version. Elspamo4 (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Don't disclose my information or Location


 * Privacy I have to use a new username, because I don't disclose my information or use passowrds. As a Mideastern student overseas I don't want to leave a clear history of who I am, as this my lead to the beheading of myself & members of my family by members of the Saudi-Qatari intelligence community, such as Mr Elspamo.  I expect Wikipedia Admin to be responsible to not help Elspamo (Qatari Intel agent) & his Saudi allies to get any information about me, as it will lead to my School IP address & in backward nations like Saudi & Qatar this means me & my family stuck in the desert might get beheaded, just because I exposed their lies & misinformation. If my family lived here, I will keep one username, one password & don't have to worry about handing all my information as soon as I arrive in the airport, unfortunately I was cursed to be born into a Kingdom that thinks they own me & their servants who who are eager to get more people beheaded Intra3829 (talk)


 * Maybe I was a bit hasty - it just seemed really suspicious that you made and used a new account immediately after you were reverted and then continued adding the same content without any sort of disclosure. If you are so concerned about you or your family's privacy, maybe you can get the edits made under your real name oversighted (meaning that they will be hidden). I'm not exactly sure how to do this but it would probably be a good idea to contact one of the oversighters listed on that page. I still find your editing pattern suspect though; I don't think I would have known how to navigate SPI as a new user. Nonetheless this SPI can probably be closed unless a patrolling admin sees reason to keep it open. Elspamo4 (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I really do not believe in this beheading scenario, so I blocked indefinitely as a sock-puppet of . Editing the same article with multiple undisclosed accounts is simply not permitted. And using them for edit-warring  is especially not allowed. If the user wants new username, he should make a WP:CHUS request.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  23:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)