Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mupplan/Archive

Evidence submitted by Kww
Obvious enough that no checkuser is required. Common interest in "Big Time Rush":. Currently insisting on adding a November 2010 Disney Channel movie when there are no apparent sources for the November date:
 * From 173.63.98.109
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=349197928
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=347920936
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=347797736
 * From Mupplan
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=349005678
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=348355247
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=348355247
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=348398490
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Disney_Channel_Original_Movies&diff=prev&oldid=348608909

Also, a fake "Kermit, Prince of Denmark" movie: and.

Mupplan has been warned about unsourced material, and has gone to level 3 warning status, which prompted him to shift back to the anonymous account. I'm nearing 3RR violations trying to keep this stuff out.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Back at it today, with a new fake movie this time.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Account blocked 72h for disruptive editing. Autoblock should get the IP. Tim Song (talk) 03:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Just a small IP hop away from the previously reported 173.63.98.109, and repeating the exact same unsourced assertion as Mupplan was making as well as 173.63.98.109. Obvious block evasion.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
blocked 2 weeks. Account's block extended to 2 weeks as well. Tim Song (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Overall, edits are pretty typical of tween Disney Channel editors. However, Disney Channel Celeb Showdown created an apparent hoax article, Me & Myself. While Disney Channel Celeb Showdown was on a 3-day block, Rangermups created a link to the hoax in a list article. It's possible that Rangermups is echoing some forum, so, before I indefinitely block a kid, I'd like a checkuser to see whether its a naive kid or a sockpuppet.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 23:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC) It's better to be safe than sorry and scare off a potential editor. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:43, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure there's a connection to here, should that be confirmed when reviewed by a checkuser then this case can be moved to Sockpuppet investigations/Backflip123. SpitfireTally-ho! 15:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't surprise me a bit. Vandalism on the various Disney Channel Original Movie and Disney Channel Series articles has been up recently, and there are quite a few short-term accounts involved.&mdash;Kww(talk) 17:14, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

that =  (SPI) =. No clear links to or, so I recommend archiving to Mupplan and applying the same administrative approach to the IP range (two weeks again). John Vandenberg (chat) 09:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This leaves me in a bit of a quandary, so I'll ask for advice before I act. DisMupp, Mupplan, and Rangermups are a serial account, and I can't find evidence that any of them was used for block evasion. However, I can safely say that the chronic addition of unsourced material into List of Disney Channel Original Movies would have resulted in an indefinite block for a single account by now. Should I block without reference to sockpuppeting, block as socks, or just issue yet another warning for the editor to ignore?&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocking under WP:SOCK per the "Avoiding scrutiny" and the "Circumventing policies or sanctions" sections of WP:ILLEGIT would be fine, I should think. SpitfireTally-ho! 13:44, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * archived from Sockpuppet investigations/Disney Channel Celeb Showdown, please see there for original page history. SpitfireTally-ho! 14:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)