Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Musical guitar prof/Archive

22 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Continued anti-Segovia edits Segovia was wrote a lot of negative content about Segovia and wide criticism quotes of him which had to be removed for neutrality sake, here and here This editor seems to be anti-Segovia and seems intent on criticising him. He is widely considered to have been one of the finest and most important classical guitarists of the 20th century. Clearly this editor does not rate him and is intent on degrading it.

Also given that this editor apparently only joined wikipedia today he was intent on citing Lead section to me here. I suspect he has several more sock accounts than this.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I was going to let this pass but then today I see a single comment by yet another new account Paul de magnus who somehow has a deep knowledge of the article history and is able to know what a previous version of the article looked like. And he's saying "I agree" with the must add criticism part. This is strongly suspicious and I'm sick of this person and his agenda and using different accounts to try to get his own way and stack support.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:53, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

"Confession" of the accused
Indeed I am willing to admit that I have used that account Lllllf. I tend to use coherent accounts on most coherent topics, but I guess I slipped on that one. Anyway, the accusation above that I am anti-Segovia is not true. I respect the artist. But what I do not respect, is a lead paragraph, that has frivolous low quality. See the discussion here: User_talk:Dr._Blofeld. Musical guitar prof (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

The fact remains you've used multiple accounts to carry an agenda.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments




-- DQ  (t)   (e)  13:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Lllllf is too. Musical guitar prof is technically ❌ to Paul de magnus.  that Musical guitar prof owns several other accounts that have edited from his range, but the behaviour of these is different: none have edited the same article, and so I am not going to name them.  AGK  [&bull; ] 15:03, 12 October 2011‎ (UTC)


 * If he is not Paul de magnus that's really what I was looking for. I though he was trying to stack a "consensus" to restore all the anti Segovia quotes. As its not him no need to pursue this further. I warned him previously about using those accounts for the same purpose.♦ Dr. Blofeld  23:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * pending further comment from a Checkuser. Ducked Lllllf, and just clarifying results on Paul. The rest i'm leaving as taken because of the huge staleness of most of them, please relist if they become active. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  20:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * What do you need clarified? Musical guitar prof and Paul de magnus were the only accounts that were checkable here, and they are technically ❌. I've watchlisted this page in case I've misunderstood your question. AGK  [&bull; ] 11:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * As posted to your talk page I was wondering if they were the same continent or not. See User talk:AGK. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Same continent, different countries, although they're not terribly far away from each other. I endorse the ❌ finding, however; I find it very unlikely that someone would cross national borders on a regular basis just to hide their identity on Wikipedia. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 23:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The weird thing about this case is the Behavior points to socking while the CU points towards meatpuppetry. I've blocked Paul as a sock of some sort, relist if stale ones come about. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  06:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)