Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NAMGOONG JINYOUNG/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The first account was previously blocked for vandalism on Korean cuisine. However, newly created users and IPs with no edits on other articles have continuously kept popping up to remove the same content, making it highly likely that they all originate from the same user. Not to mention the obvious similarities between "JINYOUNG NAMGOONG" and "NAMGOONG JINYOUNG". Telsho (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , .&#32;In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:


 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - All but one of the named accounts are and CheckUser evidence cannot be used to link the remaining account to the IPs. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No further evidence given. If this is run-of-the-mill vandalism or promotion, then it's probably not worth handling as a sockpuppet investigation. Closing without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)