Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYClay770/Archive

04 July 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Given the identical arguments at Articles for deletion/Ari Teman, I strongly suspect these are from the same editor, who is !voting repeatedly at this Afd. Please note that I agree with the IP that the article should be retained -- I just object to the way he's going about it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I see, I didn't understand that limitation on checkuser requests. I'll just await the SPI outcome, then. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, looking through all the edits by the IP -- which ain't much -- I don't see how one could make a case for socking as opposed to meat puppetry without the declined checkuser. Outside of similar statements at the Afd. So I think it was a mistake on my part bringing it here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - We will not publicly link an account to their IP address. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Closing per original reporter's comment that there really isn't a credible case here in the absence of CU evidence which we aren't allowed to gather in this situation. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)