Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NYScholar/Archive

11 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All about Harold Pinter. Same requests, quack, quack, quack. —  21:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow... I'm digging through the and I'm finding a LOT of usernames and IPs in this range that follow the same editing pattern of multiple subsequent short edits plus and minus bits at a time. I'm not saying that they are all the same person or that any one in particular is socking, just that they all have exactly the same editing pattern. What I believe may be a complete list is:
 * - now known as
 * There are so many small back to back edits from these users, it's hard to say what actual content is being changed. I'll have to research more deeply and get back to you.  I won't have time for this until Sunday at the earliest. —   00:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - now known as
 * There are so many small back to back edits from these users, it's hard to say what actual content is being changed. I'll have to research more deeply and get back to you.  I won't have time for this until Sunday at the earliest. —   00:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - now known as
 * There are so many small back to back edits from these users, it's hard to say what actual content is being changed. I'll have to research more deeply and get back to you.  I won't have time for this until Sunday at the earliest. —   00:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - now known as
 * There are so many small back to back edits from these users, it's hard to say what actual content is being changed. I'll have to research more deeply and get back to you.  I won't have time for this until Sunday at the earliest. —   00:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * - now known as
 * There are so many small back to back edits from these users, it's hard to say what actual content is being changed. I'll have to research more deeply and get back to you.  I won't have time for this until Sunday at the earliest. —   00:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - We don't publicly connect accounts to IP addresses. Also, NYScholar is extremely for CU purposes. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * , please provide some diffs to show connection between alleged master and sock.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  23:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, but we still need some evidence (preferably some diffs) to proceed. Take as much time as you want.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Since the master is so stale, even with more evidence, any connection to them will have to be made through behavioral evidence. CU may be used to tie current accounts together, but that's about as far as we can go, unfortunately. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hold on a minute, here. First, all but one of those IPs are . Second...you've implicated a lot of long-term, well-established editors, and without some really, really good evidence, I can't imagine this going anywhere. Closing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 04:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)