Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nachteilig/Archive

01 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same way of abusing other editors in his edit summary/wikilove (diff) as what the master "Nachteilig" did earlier on (1, 2, 3). Also, request to check for sleepers and be BLOCKED accordingly. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 04:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's possible there are sleepers...lets give it a try. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  06:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

No sleepers. One of the accounts was editing behind an open proxy which I've just blocked. Elockid  ( Talk ) 11:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

18 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets
 * (see previous case - SpitfireTally-ho!)
 * (see previous case - SpitfireTally-ho!)
 * (see previous case - SpitfireTally-ho!)


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Admin_preventing_me_from_challenging_unjust_block  Hazard-SJ  ㋡   00:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I was a bit curious to see this as a "new message", so I followed some of these links. I see that "Antandrus" is accusing me of being some kind of troll [], which is a weird thing considering that my recent edits, outside of the edits from October, have been very constructive. Further, he seems to think I "revealed" I am this blocked user, which has never occurred and never will. I'm not sure why "Antardus" and dave are following me around, but it doesn't seem necessary.

And when have I ever inserted any spam or inappropriate links? Please review my edit history before making these kinds of accusations.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.100.8 (talk) 01:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I'd also like to add this this [] whole line of commenting is really offensive. Dave seems to enjoy following me around and causing trouble with my edits, and generally uses what I believe to be bullying behavior. As an example, he pretty clearly voted on an AfD on Printz Board simply because I had done so, and then tries to use this as evidence on an admin's talk page as something I've somehow done wrong? Printz Board has recently been in the news for producing and appearing on the megaupload song, which caused a controversy. He's clearly notable for this alone. I added edits to his page to that effect. Am I being harassed in this manner because I'm an IP user, or because I made some ill-advised edits to a no-name mac editor in October? I can't see how this is necessary or a good use of anyone's time here. All of my edits following that have been within policy and helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.100.8 (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm going to throw this out for a sleeper check, as it's possible there's an account or two lying around (doesn't appear to focus on any particular articles, so hard to pick them up behaviourally. MO appears to consist mainly of harassing Antandrus; changing people's professions in articles; and inserting spam/inappropriate links in the form of refs). In the meantime, blocks on both the IPs listed above would be appreciated. N.B. can be used if an extra account is wanted for comparison.
 * Many thanks, SpitfireTally-ho! 00:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * ❌. Tiptoety  talk 05:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Antandrus blocked anyway, so.. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 06:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * For the record, it is my opinion that the behavioural evidence in this case justify the previous block made by Antandrus. SpitfireTally-ho! 09:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)