Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nacl11/Archive

Report date May 28 2009, 05:23 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Pelham1234

Classic Sockpuppet Behavior and he should be blocked from editing Nancy Jacobson Why? 1. Signs on in February as new user but has full command of the syntaz and launches sockpuppet investigations when challenged. He cannot be a new user without another account or accounts. 2. History shows a single purpose -- put a single negtive incident on a living person. All other edits are superfluous at best. This user has displayed no other purpose than this, strongly suggesting conflict of interest. 3. Other editors with longstanding history have edited out his material after admin review and he puts it back in over and over again violating living person guidelines. Last edits even added fully editorial and opinionated material like "but there were questions about her work."


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

SPI requires that you submit a case in the name of the MASTER account, and list the suspected socks, not just make an allegation that a user is a sock of somebody. It is interesting that this case was the reporters first ever edit to Wikipedia. Given that the subject recently filed a case that resulted in some blocks, it seems likely that this is a revenge report. Mayalld (talk) 06:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 06:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions