Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nadermohamedali/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Repeated recreation of Nader Mohamed page, which puppeteer was blocked for. Puppeteer also blocked for sock puppetry in past (see User:Mohamedkhaled50). ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  03:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Recreation of Nader Mohamed and Nader mohamed looks pretty duckish to me given what's going on at the moment, but there could definitely be sleepers. For example Khaledsalah is registered over 10 days ago. This can cause a problem, older accounts start editing and instantly become autoconfirmed... -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 03:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Nader mohamed:
 * got created on Aug 24th twice: 1, 2 by Nadermohamedali.
 * again created on Sep 4th again, although some previous attempts got blocked: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 by Khaledsalah
 * Sep 10th, 13th and 14th creation: 1, 2, 3 also by Khaledsalah

Nader Mohamed:
 * edits on Aug 25th/26th: 1, 2 by Nadermohame60
 * creation/edits on Aug 26th: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 by Mohamedkhaled50

The pages are basically the same. A CU check for sleepers would be good to deal with this situation. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 04:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Listing another account: Registered one day earlier than the alleged sockmaster. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 04:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * To help determine whether sock or meatpuppetry is most likely. Sro23 (talk) 00:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * . At this stage, it doesn't really matter whether it's sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. The secondary account is indefinitely blocked. The primary account hasn't edited in two weeks, and is quite unlikely to start editing again considering that their article about themselves has been deleted. If the primary account starts editing again, we can reevaluate whether we want to do a check then. --Deskana (talk) 09:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Moved casename to oldest account based on deleted contribs noting recreations under slightly different spellings. Since this case was declined, the first sock account which was the previously named master did resume trying to recreate his article as seen here and his block was extended to indef by . Indeffing master based on that indef block, tagging and closing. I don't see a need for a check.