Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nahsoko/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Nahsoko & 2603:8000:BD40:5B00:604B:E239:6379:1E9C have been vandalizing Los Angeles Center for Enriched Studies, and created a new account to continue to do so & revert back to vandalism-based edits. ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 06:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Just adding this comment to the mix, because it pretty much nails down that they're a sockpuppet: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thisisnotcam&oldid=1069011327 ɯ ɐ ɔ  💬 06:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Checkuser as the edit to thisisnotcam's talk page seems to suggest that they are possibly not new at this game.Mako001 (C) (T)  07:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * has soft-blocked Wizbot for the username violation, so any action will need to include upgrading that block as well, since the accounts have now been CU confirmed. I'm still not convinced that this is their first rodeo, so to speak, but I don't think we'll ever know for sure. Mako001 (C) (T)  14:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No edits since they were reported here, might I suggest that the user be given some WP:ROPE, left with a warning about their behaviour, and close this for now? Any block now would probably be shorter than the time that this case has been open for. If anything else starts up, they can't say that they weren't warned. Blocking now would seem rather pointless anyway, since it would hardly be preventing ongoing disruption? Just my 0.50 AUD. Mako001 (C) (T)  13:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, --  Amanda (she/her)  11:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I notice that there's no temporal overlap between these two users, so confirmed notwithstanding, I don't see how we could implement a block for socking. There may well be other reasons to block (i.e. disruptive editing).  I'm not actually sure what the right thing to do here is, so I'll just leave this note and kick the problem to the next person to look at this case :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 00:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Warning left on talkpages of each account regarding sockpuppetry and vandalism. Closing. This should be considered their final chance; any further disruption of any nature (whether from one of these accounts or a new one) should result in blocks. Jack Frost (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)