Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nathantheawesomeguy/Archive

09 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets

ChristianandJericho (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

More proof received, user took away the evidence I put on his talk page -- Christian and Jericho 07:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment this user says he was blocked a long time ago but was never blocked until a DAY before he posted this message --ChristianandJericho (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * TnxMan: There is some shadowy "evidence" that could lead one to think that Jake was created as a sock puppet for edit warring. See the history of Surviving High School. I still think it's too blurry for it to be a duck. —  Kudu ~I/O~ 14:48, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Has check user confirmed that they are not the same? -- Christian and Jericho 04:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Maybe I missed this, but why do you think these two accounts are operated by the same person contra policy? TN X Man 14:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I do not know where the report went but I'll restate everything, both users edit the same, when they revert my edits, they do not click "undo" so I think they have a file of the copyrighted text on Surviving High School on the computer also Jake got "revenge" on me for NOTHING at all to do with his account, so I believe he was getting back at me for getting his other accound blocked. --ChristianandJericho  (talk) 14:48, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * - Based on the similarity of these two edits, I'll endorse. Having said that, I think it's somewhat possible that we're looking at meatpuppetry. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:48, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment a put a really long report when I first made this investigation, I "replaced the text" in the box, do you know where the information went? --ChristianandJericho (talk) 07:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the article history - it's not here. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * it doesn't matter anyway, I restated everything above --ChristianandJericho (talk) 12:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Technical evidence suggests that these accounts are ❌. AGK  [&bull; ] 21:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Meaty, then. This seems to have quieted down a bit, so I'll close for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)