Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naudefj/Archive

Evidence submitted by Pohta ce-am pohtit
It looks like the main editor of FUDforum created a sockpuppet for himself when his article was taken to AfD. Iliaal posted almost immediately after Naudefj with an identical format of evidence, and similarly poor choices for sources. It could be a meatpuppet though, so a checkuser is needed to make the distinction. (Feel free to process this after the AfD closes in order to meet the requirements for code letter 'C', but it seems odd one would have to wait...)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Pcap ping  21:25, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Not much to go on here. This seems less like a sock and more like a meatpuppet, perhaps, but the only evidence is "new user at AfD," which isn't enough to say anything. It's worth observing how the AfD turns out, but it's BITEy to jump right to socking here. ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 21:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)